Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

walker's worcester sauce flavour french fries

seabrooks eh? being a southern jessie i have never come across seabrooks crisps. can a northerner send me a couple of packets of worcester sauce and / or tomato sauce crisps please and i may just love them forever.
 
DrRingDing said:
Write them a letter explaing your horror at finding a maggot/plaster/pubic hair in your crisps.

That should earn you a few packets :cool:
I can back you up on this.
 
bluestreak said:
seabrooks eh? being a southern jessie i have never come across seabrooks crisps. can a northerner send me a couple of packets of worcester sauce and / or tomato sauce crisps please and i may just love them forever.

You can buy multipacks in the Morrisons in Stratford.

/useless
 
*pats subz on head*

do i look like the kind of person who goes to morrisons. or stratford.

*offended*
 
Vintage Paw said:
Worcester Sauce Chip Sticks (as my hubby calls them - weirdo) are definitely made of win. :cool:

they are definately the sex....and healthy as crisps go so the dieting girls tell me as they cram another packet in:rolleyes:
 
SubZeroCat said:
How are they healthy? :D


less fat than normal crisps?...trust me I could tell you the nutritional... well calorie / fat content of all crisps thanks to the vacuous dieters surrounding me. French fries / quavers = healthiest....MCCoys the worst....what these idiots fail to grasp however is that eating shovelling them in is not going to make the pounds drop off....:rolleyes: still keeps them happy
 
DRINK? said:
less fat than normal crisps?...trust me I could tell you the nutritional... well calorie / fat content of all crisps thanks to the vacuous dieters surrounding me. French fries / quavers = healthiest....MCCoys the worst....what these idiots fail to grasp however is that eating shovelling them in is not going to make the pounds drop off....:rolleyes: still keeps them happy

Tell them they are wrong and deluding themselves. Just because one crisp type is lower in saturated fat than the other crisp type doesn't mean it's "healthy". Slightly less fattening yes but healthy, no.

Let's not forget the sugar and salt content!
 
SubZeroCat said:
Tell them they are wrong and deluding themselves. Just because one crisp type is lower in saturated fat than the other crisp type doesn't mean it's "healthy". Slightly less fattening yes but healthy, no.

Let's not forget the sugar and salt content!

Quavers have only 89 calories a bag and 4g of fat.

Regular crisps are about 200 calories and 12g of fat.
 
PacificOcean said:
Quavers have only 89 calories a bag and 4g of fat.

Regular crisps are about 200 calories and 12g of fat.

Crisps aren't a healthy food. End of. (and not just cos of fat content)

(although they can be eaten as part of a healthy diet)
 
and monster munch are actually good for you*.. FACT**


*unless you are allergic to them of course in which case they may not be good for you

** source Tjug enterprises ltd
 
Vintage Paw said:
You check a crisp manufacturer's website :confused:

You only get four Seabrook flavours if you go round the shops here & plain/cheese & onion predominate. There was little other choice but order a box! :D

The new online ordering page is quite funny as well if you turn-up the sound. :)
 
i don't really understand the fuss about seabrooks. i think they're a case of style over substance. i don't believe the hype.

i've only got four p in my pocket and a tenner in the bank to last me until tuesday, and you bastards have made me think lascivious things about a packet of bacon wheat crunchies. i'm not supposed to be buying snacks, i've got to buy milk and bread and baked beans and sensible pauper food, but i want some fucking wheat crunchies! it wouldn't even have to be wheat crunchies, i'd even settle for a packet of space raiders. :( <<< me, jonesin' for crisps.
 
today i bought two packets from the sandwich man so i could keep one in my desk drawer for next week rather than risk someone else buying them. i need help.
 
Back
Top Bottom