were they anarchists, they never said so
I beleive that on these boards somewhere and in comments made to the media you might see that they did refer to themselves as anarchists
were they anarchists, they never said so
. We leave all that embassy stuff for them London folks.

My own personal experience, which dates back to the early 1990's when I first got into politics.
you see thats where our experiences differyes those london youths from boarding school i belive![]()
No i stated in my first post where IMO the answer to the question of funds to produce magazines is to be found. I then raised what i believe to be a fair question with regards to the lack of anarchists posting on the welfare reform bill thread. I also asked why so many anarchists seem by looking around on these boards at least not to be concerned by a bill which will effect them if they claim benefits.This IMO does not constitue trolling I have not IMO insulted anyone unless the term 'rich kids' is an Insult at most i am guilty of sarcasm. I honestly cannot see the point of such a magzine a magzine which no one else on this thread has really attempted to explain the funding for. Also if you and nobody else cares much about it then i do not understand what your problem is
well theres no arguing with that is there.you see thats where our experiences differ
I beleive that on these boards somewhere and in comments made to the media you might see that they did refer to themselves as anarchists
things
Next time I'm in London I'll run a straw poll amongst the scaffolders, Mastic Men and other trades to see how many went to boarding school. I'll make a preliminary guess at 0%
I'm not arguing with you. Stop shitting on threads or I'll ban you yet again, it's not hard.

and ask them how many were in that mansion in the middle of london next to the american embassy while your at it. I'll make a preliminary guess at 0%
fact is i can think of one anarchist i know with a trust fund,

what a daft thing to say
since you seem to know, could you provide some information on the socio-economic status of the people who squatted that mansion
i dont think bakhunin knows them![]()
and how have i been shiting on this thread? All i have done is voice my opinion i have not even insulted anyone . Not one person!!! Still do whatever gets your rocks off![]()
Anarchists = Rich kids with turst/hedge funds
I should have known it was dangerous to bring up money like this... its really not worth bringing any animosity to the table.
If it was funded through fundraisers - great
if some rich individual can afford it - super
i was just curious
I should have known it was dangerous to bring up money like this... its really not worth bringing any animosity to the table.
If it was funded through fundraisers - great
if some rich individual can afford it - super
i was just curious
What type of surevy did you use to collect this vast amountof data pray?![]()
thats not an opinion its a statement of fact and one quite so obviously incorrect and crass that it looks very much like trolling

IMO it is not incorrect
What request?
I asked if we could exchange views civilly which seemed to sort of work
You might be referring to smokedouts post about the socio-economic make up of them next to the embassy lot fella.
well your opinion is clearly wrong
its not about being thin skinned its about you making stuff up and then spouting it as fact
firstly dont call me son dick
secondly, you have met a couple of anarchists who were from upper middle class backgrounds which had led you to state that all anarchists have trust funds
which clearly isnt true as the anarchists on this thread, none of whom appear to have trust funds, have explained
so fuck off eh

Your being totaly unreasonable.
If an anarchists on welfare how could they afford to go to the pub and make enough collective donations to the extent to fund this publication.![]()
So you either have to have a trust fund OR be on benefits?