Jeff Robinson
Marxist-Lentilist: Jackboots and Jackfruit
Why would it be necessary to consolidate power in order to mobilize new forms of politics? Why is a failure to grab more power seen as withdrawal? What are the specific forces that are getting in the way of new politics? Will turning 24 parties into one actually do anything to tackle those forces?
History seems to have plenty of examples of people seizing vast amounts of power so that they can redistribute it fairly, but the latter usually fails to happen. No matter how much power and control is obtained, opposing forces working against the cause remain, giving justification to hang onto power, and over time this power corrupts. Few are immune to the great doublethink of democracy, that you want to give power to the people but only once the people have been taught to do the right thing with the power, and attempts to teach them are where it gets ugly.
Oh come elbows - power isn't just control over the executive or some abstract notion divorsed from social relationships. Do multinational corporations have power in Venezuela? Do the domestic ruling class who control most of the media not pocess power? Is the influence of US imperialism not another source of power?
Leftists shouldn't fall for the old "big government bad" arguements of the Hayekites - what matters is not the size of government but its character - how accountable is it, who's interests does it represents etc
The voluntary merging of political parties to form a united front to resist the various sources of social, political and economic power like yankee imperialism, multinational corporations and the domestic elites is sometime that progressives should welcome - the mobalisation of democratic political power to resist the unaccountable tyranny of the free market.
