Kid_Eternity
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
I was incredibly cynical about this film when I heard about it having just watched the trailer I can't say my opinion has changed much...
Official site
Official site

alan moore didn't want anything to do with the film, iirc-Kid_Eternity said:I was incredibly cynical about this film when I heard about it having just watched the trailer I can't say my opinion has changed much...
Official site

he's refused to have anything more to do with the film industry, afaik-TheLostProphet said:when moore takes his name off it, it'll tank. look at league of extraordinary gentlemen.


shoddysolutions said:On the other hand, natalie portman shaving her hair was a delightful move![]()
Azrael said:Much joy as I'd take from carping -- and I would, I've got a miniscule tolerance level for misfire mogules and bloated trilogies -- got to admit it doesn't look that bad. Overplayed action, bombastic score, glowering villians, check, but looks like they've preseved the central premise of the comic. "Ideas are bullet proof" ain't Alan Moore, but keeps his basic intention. If it gets half the depth of the comic over along with all the Matrix-esque gubbins it's worth making.
Yeah, but scripts go through loads of drafts, and all those reviews are unconfirmed. Read a review that said the "V symbol" reminiscent of the Anarchist "A" was gone, but it's in the trailer. Will wait and see if they've gutted it, though I admit the idea of a studio making a two hour advert for Anarchy is a tad unlikely.N2Oboy said:If Rich Johnston's script review is right, then a lot of Moore's central themes have been cut.
Bugger.
I'll probably go and see it anyway though.

Azrael said:Yeah, but scripts go through loads of drafts, and all those reviews are unconfirmed. Read a review that said the "V symbol" reminiscent of the Anarchist "A" was gone, but it's in the trailer. Will wait and see if they've gutted it, though I admit the idea of a studio making a two hour advert for Anarchy is a tad unlikely.![]()

Kid_Eternity said:I read the other day that this has been pushed back to next March because of the recent London bombings...

RavensClaw said:such a shame that its gonna suck more that a thai hooker, god forbid thy fuck up watchman...

Watchmen is hardly current though, is it? The whole story is pretty contingent on the existence of two opposing, nuclear superpowers.jer said:Watchmen's been dropped. Allegories for current events aren't much in vogue, it would appear.![]()
In Bloom said:Watchmen is hardly current though, is it? The whole story is pretty contingent on the existence of two opposing, nuclear superpowers.

But Sin City was always more style than substance. Far, far easier to adapt than Moore's stuff.RavensClaw said:they dropped wachman? thank god for that! have to say tho sin city was good stuff tho
Watchmen is certainly the more considered and original of the two, but V for Vendetta is, IMO, much more fun to readDonna Ferentes said:I didn't much rate the comic strip when I read it, although to be fair I read it long after Watchmen which is a far more substantial and mature piece of work.
