CyberRose
أرفع الشفرات
So you don't see honour killings as a "real" problem faced by some women around the world that needs to be tackled?Not really, it just suggests he's a nutter.
So you don't see honour killings as a "real" problem faced by some women around the world that needs to be tackled?Not really, it just suggests he's a nutter.
So what !!!old English king Henry is still the daddy 4 beheads, and he was the boss of the church of England.
Erm so are you arguing that is IS ok to chop off womens' heads for religious reasons, or are you arguing that it is NOT ok to chop womens' heads off for religious reasons?So what !!!old English king Henry is still the daddy 4 beheads, and he was the boss of the church of England.
But if it was an honour killing then that would suggest a cultural problem related to the man's religious beliefs, and surely that is an important issue to discuss?
Btw, that's MR Rosie to you
Honour killing is a cultural practice, not a specifically Islamic practice. This is why the problem exists within Sikh, Hindu, and (to a lesser extent) Eastern European communities.
How news stories are reported is nothing to do with me. If you want to label that a Christian fundamentalist killing that's fine by me, because in my mind it probably was. Why isn't the word "Christian" in the headline? Or more specifically, why does the word "Muslim" appear in Islamic religious killings? That, is probably down to prejudiceWhy wasn't the murder of Victoria Climbié framed as 'Christian couple murder child' then?
Nobody is saying it's a specifically Islamic practice. Also, many women are killed in relationships that have nothing to do with religion, but might very well be classed as "honour killings". Also, nobody is saying that honour killings are in inherent part of Islam.Honour killing is a cultural practice, not a specifically Islamic practice. This is why the problem exists within Sikh, Hindu, and (to a lesser extent) Eastern European communities.
It's because criticising anything Islamic is racist, so in order to criticise something in Islamic culture they do not agree with, they have to separate the "Islamic" bit out of it (which then allows them to make a criticism of all religions, not just Islam, and win points in the middle class competition to see who can be the most liberal and enlightened)Does Islam constitute part of peoples culture? If so, why are certain peple seeking to make a clean differentiation between the two and put all the bad stuff on culture?
How news stories are reported is nothing to do with me. If you want to label that a Christian fundamentalist killing that's fine by me, because in my mind it probably was. Why isn't the word "Christian" in the headline? Or more specifically, why does the word "Muslim" appear in Islamic religious killings? That, is probably down to prejudice
Nobody is saying it's a specifically Islamic practice. Also, many women are killed in relationships that have nothing to do with religion, but might very well be classed as "honour killings". Also, nobody is saying that honour killings are in inherent part of Islam.
However, in cases of Islamic honour killings, religious beliefs are used as a justification to kill these women. The same religious beliefs are used as an excuse to take away the rights of women through their life as well. If you have any belief in equal rights for women, you wouldn't, as nino does, make excuses for ANY type of honour killing no matter what culture it occurred in.
Women have the right to not have to put up with relationships like this, and these kind of beliefs that men can treat women however they see fit because their religion oks it should be challenged by everyone believes in womens' rights.
People like nino only help in consolidating these crimes, because they excuse them and accuse people who are against them of being racist (which is rich coming from someone who hates English people and hates Christians but hey)
Why do different types of honour killings get separated out? Because all cultures are different and the way of dealing with this problem in one culture will be different from dealing with it in another culture
Tell me - are womens' rights organisations racist for opposing honour killings?
I don't understand why you're having a go at me for criticising honour killings then?Tell me, have I ever said that criticism of Islam is racist?
Tell me, have I ever said that womens' rights organisations are racist for opposing honour killings?
I have said that seeing religion as the route cause (as your statement "But if it was an honour killing then that would suggest a cultural problem related to the man's religious beliefs" leads me to think you do. If I'm wrong then, sorry) isn't actually that factually correct, and b: is part of the narrative that creates a dangerous 'them and us' based on the problematic history of Western Christianity and the easten 'other' (wether it be Jews, Muslims, or even the Eastern Orthodox churches).
In backward (there i said it) patriarchal cultures really existing islam often functions as a support and legitimating device for patriarchal relations. Simplistic models of culture on one side and religion on the other are not only wrong, but they can actively harm those who are fighting back against this patriarchal culture by removing from the field of criticism one of the main support struts for that sort of society - and by stigmatising those who do make those criticims as racists or somehow dodgy. Here's another narrative that creates a them and us.
(Not that i see why creating situations of them and us is such a problem).
Like I said, nobody is trying to demonise the religion. Nobody is saying honour killings is "typical" of all Muslims. The fact is, it happens in some communities and is also tied in to the oppression of women in those communities. That is something that needs to change and something any sane person should support. But some people are more concerned about being called racist that challenging certain beliefs and practices they disagree with...All the Abrahamic religions are patriarchal, and have been used to ideologically prop up patriarchal societies.
Obviously culture and religion is entwined. But I don't see how demonising the religion helps.
Erm can you point me to any Muslim womens' rights groups who agree with honour killings?!are Muslim women's groups who don't see their belief as a barrier to their work for women's rights incorrect then?
Why not the rock ( as well)? Esp as you've just give it the primary role.
I note that when that mad canadian beheaded a fellow bus passenger, his religion didn't get mentioned at all![]()
I don't recall anyone saying Muslims were the only cruel people in the world?HI CYBER ROSE What I am saying is Muslims' are not the only stupid cruel people in the world, plenty of others' are just as bad and mad, to woman in every day life and history. I dont' agree with chopping heads off anyone .
First of all, no need to yell.
Secondly, CNN is hardly Fox News.

Never heard it called that before, but heard plenty call it the Communist news network because of its perceived liberal bias...yeah its' not known as the christian news network for nuttin is it...
are there other sources for this story though...

aye. someone down the pub started to tell me about this, but i had to close my ears cos i couldn't deal with any sad/distressing/angering news.Thank you TomUS for posting the CNN link. I probably would have missed the story otherwise.

yeah its' not known as the christian news network for nuttin is it...
are there other sources for this story though...
ps i know it's cable news network ffs![]()
Thank you TomUS for posting the CNN link. I probably would have missed the story otherwise. It's an important story because the murderer founded a TV station in the wake of 9/11 (something the Beeb fails to mention) to improve the US perception of muslims.