Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

US inequality

JHE said:
Well, I don't understand what you don't understand - but I'll have another go at asking the question.

Of the US poor, you say "Fuck em". Your reason seems to be that they have more than "some kid in Malaysia". I think you also have more than "some kid in Malaysia". Should people's attitude to you be the same as your attitude to impoverished people in the US? If not, why not?

Right, because I don't have children your point went right over my head like two distant white lines of vapour pearcing the sky like a silver needle. I guess if I did have kids I'd be less of an arse about it. Point taken, not fuck em then, just I've seen shantytown cities and how poor people live in Nigeria, so it's sometimes it's difficult for me to remember that American poor people have a tough time too, even though they live in the richest and most powerfull and most greedy nation on Earth. All that bling the often overwieght American poor seem to care about can make it easy to dismiss their plight compared to people who don't get to eat much.
 
JHE said:
Well, I don't understand what you don't understand - but I'll have another go at asking the question.

Of the US poor, you say "Fuck em". Your reason seems to be that they have more than "some kid in Malaysia". I think you also have more than "some kid in Malaysia". Should people's attitude to you be the same as your attitude to impoverished people in the US? If not, why not?

No i don't think he means it like that. I think he means that he finds it difficult to see the impoverished in the US as being AS impoverished as those in the other countries. He has less sympathy because he has less awareness. This is possibly because US poverty at this level tends to be reported less. It's america's dirty secret, if you will.
 
He/she's probably middle class and so is trying to assuage his/her feelings of guilt by badmouthing the people he wishes he/she didn't have to know about. I have noticed it before.
 
Ryazan said:
He/she's probably middle class and so is trying to assuage his/her feelings of guilt by badmouthing the people he wishes he/she didn't have to know about. I have noticed it before.

I'm sure you have a penetrating understanding of everything.
 
rocketman said:
No i don't think he means it like that. I think he means that he finds it difficult to see the impoverished in the US as being AS impoverished as those in the other countries. He has less sympathy because he has less awareness. This is possibly because US poverty at this level tends to be reported less. It's america's dirty secret, if you will.

So how poor exactly do Amerca's poor come, we're talking about more then Jerry Springer grade trailer-folk right?
 
foreigner said:
I'm sure you have a penetrating understanding of everything.

As I am sure you do.

Why do you have so much contempt for the poor in the USA, but fetishise the poor in other countries?

Jerry Springer. What kind of world do you live in?
 
Ryazan said:
As I am sure you do.

Why do you have so much contempt for the poor in the USA, but fetishise the poor in other countries?

Fetishize! :eek:

Well, I dunno about that but I have experienced the poor in the 3rd world, whereas all I know about the American poor comes from teevee, film and music. I admit this is an inadequate knowlegde so I'm willing to correct my bigoted comments from before in light of better information. But simply put- nobody who kills for trainers (as was the craze a few years ago) will get my sympathy over people who's kids work twelve hour days down coal-mines and corporate coffee farms jus so they can eat (as is the case in parts of South America). If this is a 'fetish' then so be it.
 
Why the blanket assumption of poor Americans killing for trainers?

What did you do for these people slaving in the developing world? Other than just looking at them.
 
foreigner said:
So how poor exactly do Amerca's poor come, we're talking about more then Jerry Springer grade trailer-folk right?
Well, some are hungry. I'd say that's pretty bad.
 
JHE said:
Well, some are hungry. I'd say that's pretty bad.

That's poor enough for my sympathy. From the knowledge I get, you wouldn't guess there are hungry Americans. Do they often die of malnutrition too?
 
foreigner said:
That's poor enough for my sympathy. From the knowledge I get, you wouldn't guess there are hungry Americans. Do they often die of malnutrition too?
Fair point
 
Ryazan said:
Why the blanket assumption of poor Americans killing for trainers?

What did you do for these people slaving in the developing world? Other than just looking at them.

Not a blanket assumptioin that they all do, but if that's about the level of what Americans call poverty, that some feel they have to kill to take part in the consumer circus then, I reffer you to my earlier sentiments.
 
mattkidd12 said:
Has anybody heard the argument: "But the American poor are better off than other poor people, from other countries?"

People from other countries are our poor.

We have massive illegal imigration. And yes they are counted in the censue, and they do drag the numbers down.
 
pbman said:
People from other countries are our poor.

We have massive illegal imigration. And yes they are counted in the censue, and they do drag the numbers down.

Would you be a Minuteman peebs? I mean if you lived in California or whatever.
 
To foreigner

Yes, granted, but the situation of the poor in the USA is more complex than that. What about Central and South American immigrants working illegally in the US? Whatr about Central and South American gangs involved in violence in the US?

There are families supporting one another without any proper welfare provision, and for many it is due to more legitiamte concerns other than just wanting a pair of Nikes. Unemployment, and being born into low income familesw affects you r chances. The idea that the poor deserve their poverty, because they are lazy or only desire superfluous items from the consumer culture that exists there is very wrong. Yes, some poor people have and cause problems, but many are sturggling to get by, with little help, no matter what "good choices" they make.
 
foreigner said:
That's poor enough for my sympathy. From the knowledge I get, you wouldn't guess there are hungry Americans. Do they often die of malnutrition too?
I don't know how many people in the US actually die from hunger. (A few judicious googles might find the answer, if you are really curious.) More, obviously, will die of poverty in ways - especially among those who lack access to proper medical treatment.

If I understand your view correctly, you think poverty is entirely a matter of 'absolute poverty' - i.e., not enough calories, lack of crucial nutrients, freezing to death in winter, complete destitution etc.

Poverty is also 'relative' - i.e., the lack of means to participate in, and lead a life considered normal in, the society in which you live. That's one reason why the issue of inequality matters, as well as the question of the absolute level of consumption.
 
Ryazan said:
Yes, granted, but the situation of the poor in the USA is more complex than that. What about Central and South American immigrants working illegally in the US? Whatr about Central and South American gangs involved in violence in the US?

There are families supporting one another without any proper welfare provision, and for many it is due to more legitiamte concerns other than just wanting a pair of Nikes. Unemployment, and being born into low income familesw affects you r chances. The idea that the poor deserve their poverty, because they are lazy or only desire superfluous items from the consumer culture that exists there is very wrong. Yes, some poor people have and cause problems, but many are sturggling to get by, with little help, no matter what "good choices" they make.

I don't beleive in the merit=wealth argument, I think it's bollocks because the system's tilted toward the wealthy and their children.

I'd consider Latin American immigrants from the poor nations America has spent the last 50 years fucking-up mercilessly to be part of the poverty outside of America. Once they get to America they bring the poverty they had back home with them. In a way it's a lesson about chickens coming home to roost and how what goes on in the 3rd world effects what goes on in the 1st.
 
JHE said:
I don't know how many people in the US actually die from hunger. (A few judicious googles might find the answer, if you are really curious.) More, obviously, will die of poverty in ways - especially among those who lack access to proper medical treatment.

If I understand your view correctly, you think poverty is entirely a matter of 'absolute poverty' - i.e., not enough calories, lack of crucial nutrients, freezing to death in winter, complete destitution etc.

Poverty is also 'relative' - i.e., the lack of means to participate in, and lead a life considered normal in, the society in which you live. That's one reason why the issue of inequality matters, as well as the question of the absolute level of consumption.

Fair enough, relative to poor in the 3rd world, all Americans live like kings.
 
foreigner said:
Fair enough, relative to poor in the 3rd world, all Americans live like kings.
All of them?

Is His Majesty is just begging for fun?
story.poverty.jpg~1094361971012965200.jpg
 
foreigner said:
Would you be a Minuteman peebs? I mean if you lived in California or whatever.

Of course. A good friend of mine was down their last winter.

And no he's not a racist, that charge is low rent commie propganda.
 
JHE said:
All of them?

Is His Majesty is just begging for fun?
story.poverty.jpg~1094361971012965200.jpg

Ah, but he's a tramp. You can't compare poverty with mental illness and addiction, for all you know he could be a millionaire. But since even American poverty can lead to mental illness and addiction, I'll accept your point.
 
Back
Top Bottom