Kanda
Diving wanker
I'd do that if the cash was alright![]()
o..k.. so.. PM me what you think is a good rate


I'd do that if the cash was alright![]()


So how come it only costs £10 for a blowy off of you then?

Mate's rates for you![]()
You may earn £10 per hour too, but I bet you get paid holidays, a contribution to a pension fund and life insurance with that too. And I bet you get it for a solid 7 hours rather than having to travel between jobs during the day and not getting paid during that travel time.
do you know that for a fact?Yeah but you only have to travel to one location, and sit at a desk all day do odd bits of work between posting on urban![]()


do you know that for a fact?![]()
I used to be a cleaner too, never got anywhere near a tenner an hour though, I've been swizzed!
The most I got was £6 an hour, which back in the early 90s wasn't so bad.I recommend you get off your arse and clean your own home.

Brilliant! I'll spend my free time when im not working 40 hours per week plus travel time cleaning up after four messy boys![]()

You don't have the time to do your own cleaning because you spend 40 hours per week doing a job that is less well paid than the person your paying to do your cleaning for you because you spend all your time working...
a ruthless capitalist you may yet fail to make![]()
![]()

I doubt her and the 4 boys together earn less than the prospective cleaner.
E2A: Oi! You edited.![]()
She said up there that she earns less per hour than she is planning to pay her cleaner...
And I assume the four boys are children...
You quoted my edited post![]()

No. they are full grown probably employed boys, none of whom she is related to afaik.
Then why do they need to be cleaned up after?
Thinkin about it: the money I earn for my full-time temp job is moot. I'd pay a cleaner lots more (if I could afford it) as they're only doing the 2 hours or whatever. For instance: thirty notes to do all my sweeping, mopping, hoovering, dusting etc is totally worth it.
*nudgesthreadwithsharpelbow*
Exactly, 10 an hour might be decent pro rata, but it's shite when you consider that they probably only have a couple of jobs like that a day, and then there's the travel etc.

Often they only want to do a few hours a week though, to fit in with childcare etc, and work locally. I could get our cleaner lots of work if she wanted it, but she only wants three clients per week.![]()
She said up there that she earns less per hour than she is planning to pay her cleaner...
And I assume the four boys are children...

But you should nonetheless expect to pay them more per hour than you would someone who you were employing for a full day - I think that's the point.
You assume wrongly.
They are adults.
I have no problem paying the cleaner a higher hourly rate than I get paid myself, as I vaule the work that she does.
I don't want to have a messy house, I don't want to be a nag.
So we have a cleaner. And I don't feel gulity about it not one bit![]()

You assume wrongly.
They are adults.
I have no problem paying the cleaner a higher hourly rate than I get paid myself, as I vaule the work that she does.
I don't want to have a messy house, I don't want to be a nag.
So we have a cleaner. And I don't feel gulity about it not one bit![]()

Not necessarily. It's negotiable. The cleaner can look at their time/costs and set an hourly rate that takes that into account. I do not get paid for travel to work, and if I did I wouldn't get paid more if my job was part-time.

She's not paying someone more than she get's paid, she's only paying 1/5th of the cost for a few hours a week, not a 40 hour week.