Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Urgent! Recommend Me A Cleaner.

is it one of those stripper cleaners?

prepdeck-stripper-cleaner.jpg
 
You may earn £10 per hour too, but I bet you get paid holidays, a contribution to a pension fund and life insurance with that too. And I bet you get it for a solid 7 hours rather than having to travel between jobs during the day and not getting paid during that travel time.

I dont get anything like that. I'm an agency worker....

I'm not complaining...
 
Yeah but you only have to travel to one location, and sit at a desk all day do odd bits of work between posting on urban :p
do you know that for a fact? :p :D

I used to be a cleaner too, never got anywhere near a tenner an hour though, I've been swizzed!
 
I got about £10 an hour over ten years ago but that was cleaning council places/student halls/former squats and other challenging places.
 
Brilliant! I'll spend my free time when im not working 40 hours per week plus travel time cleaning up after four messy boys :hmm:

You don't have the time to do your own cleaning because you spend 40 hours per week doing a job that is less well paid than that of the person you're employing to do your cleaning for you because you spend all your time working...

a ruthless capitalist you may yet fail to make :hmm: :D
 
You don't have the time to do your own cleaning because you spend 40 hours per week doing a job that is less well paid than the person your paying to do your cleaning for you because you spend all your time working...

a ruthless capitalist you may yet fail to make :hmm: :D

I doubt her and the 4 boys together earn less than the prospective cleaner.

E2A: Oi! You edited. :mad:
 
Thinkin about it: the money I earn for my full-time temp job is moot. I'd pay a cleaner lots more (if I could afford it) as they're only doing the 2 hours or whatever. For instance: thirty notes to do all my sweeping, mopping, hoovering, dusting etc is totally worth it.


*nudgesthreadwithsharpelbow*

Exactly, 10 an hour might be decent pro rata, but it's shite when you consider that they probably only have a couple of jobs like that a day, and then there's the travel etc.
 
We found an agency in the end that hasn't yet been scared off by the sight of us. £14 per hour. We're going to ask how much of that actually goes to the cleaner though, plus what employment benefits/protections they have.
 
Exactly, 10 an hour might be decent pro rata, but it's shite when you consider that they probably only have a couple of jobs like that a day, and then there's the travel etc.

Often they only want to do a few hours a week though, to fit in with childcare etc, and work locally. I could get our cleaner lots of work if she wanted it, but she only wants three clients per week. :)
 
Often they only want to do a few hours a week though, to fit in with childcare etc, and work locally. I could get our cleaner lots of work if she wanted it, but she only wants three clients per week. :)

But you should nonetheless expect to pay them more per hour than you would someone who you were employing for a full day - I think that's the point.
 
She said up there that she earns less per hour than she is planning to pay her cleaner...

And I assume the four boys are children...

You assume wrongly.

They are adults.

I have no problem paying the cleaner a higher hourly rate than I get paid myself, as I vaule the work that she does.

I don't want to have a messy house, I don't want to be a nag.

So we have a cleaner. And I don't feel gulity about it not one bit :p
 
But you should nonetheless expect to pay them more per hour than you would someone who you were employing for a full day - I think that's the point.

Not necessarily. It's negotiable. The cleaner can look at their time/costs and set an hourly rate that takes that into account. I do not get paid for travel to work, and if I did I wouldn't get paid more if my job was part-time.

You assume wrongly.

They are adults.

I have no problem paying the cleaner a higher hourly rate than I get paid myself, as I vaule the work that she does.

I don't want to have a messy house, I don't want to be a nag.

So we have a cleaner. And I don't feel gulity about it not one bit :p

Go girl! :)
 
You assume wrongly.

They are adults.

I have no problem paying the cleaner a higher hourly rate than I get paid myself, as I vaule the work that she does.

I don't want to have a messy house, I don't want to be a nag.

So we have a cleaner. And I don't feel gulity about it not one bit :p

I didn't suggest that you should feel guilty - I suggested that it was a little odd that you paid someone more than you get paid yourself rather than working fewer hours and doing your own cleaning :confused: :rolleyes:

But then, you are living with other adults who behave like children, so perhaps normal suggestions don't apply.
 
She's not paying someone more than she get's paid, she's only paying 1/5th of the cost for a few hours a week, not a 40 hour week.
 
Not necessarily. It's negotiable. The cleaner can look at their time/costs and set an hourly rate that takes that into account. I do not get paid for travel to work, and if I did I wouldn't get paid more if my job was part-time.

If the point that you're trying to make is that the amount you need to pay for a given service will be set by the market, then yes, well done, you're right.

This is not really the point of the discussion that we have been having, however :confused:
 
She's not paying someone more than she get's paid, she's only paying 1/5th of the cost for a few hours a week, not a 40 hour week.

She has said that she is prepared to pay more per hour than she gets herself. How much of it she personally contributes is immaterial - why doesn't she do the cleaning herself and collect the £10 p/h (minus one fifth) from her housemates? Why would she turn down work that she is in a position to give herself - if it's so attractive?
 
Back
Top Bottom