Ok don't take this the wrong way but let's look at what you've said.
I know of "herb" infected chocolates given by kid dealers to children in primary schools and pretending to be made by the brands I listed to avoid parents getting suspicious. It is the best way to get kids addicted, isn't it.
salaam.
here you are claiming to know of (by which it's understood that you have experince of) herb infected chocolates given by kid dealers (either children who deal or people who deal to children) and pretending to be made by the brands I listed to avoid parents getting suspicious (Brand Chocolates are being used to disguise drugs in order that the drugs purchases of school children are hidden from them.) It's the best way to get kids addicted, isn't it. (suposition as to the motivation behind doing such a thing)
Then you say:
Argue all you want, you are not informed on the matter I speak off. I happen to be in the chocolate business since born into it from my mother's side. I now what happens. I know other sweets are similarly used, I happen to have a whole clad of family members in Belgium and a whole lot of them go to school. The children are constantly warned not to take anything, not from class mates and certainly not from strangers.
salaam.
Argue all you want, (I will not listen to evidence to the contray) you are not informed on the matter I speak off ( I Know more than you). I happen to be in the chocolate business since born into it from my mother's side (It is an area where I have personal experience, vicariously/second hand via my mother who has imparted this information to me. I have no reason to doubt my mother why would she lie). I now what happens (No Value is placed on this information as it's circumstantial). I know other sweets are similarly used, I happen to have a whole clad of family members in Belgium and a whole lot of them go to school (school children of famliy members also claim this is true). The children are constantly warned not to take anything, not from class mates and certainly not from strangers (standard warning to all children having nothing to do with drugs what so ever but to do with not being abducted by strangers who may offer incentives such as puppies sweeties or technology in order to befriend and gan trust of impressionable children who can be bought with seemingly easy rewards).
nothing here highlighting anything with in the first claim other than attempting to exhert authority over the discussion by way of second hand evidence, all of which is circumstantial and fundementally misses the reasoning behind or the logic attached to the actions taken.
Sure. I don't know what I talk about while I'm born into the chocolate trade...Because I suddenly lost my brain... or something
Oh look, all good import comes from the USA (again)
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/02/health/main2752266.shtml
http://www.10news.com/news/13360601/detail.html
http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/...Issue_id=5b902c31-7e9c-9af9-7e14-8def7ec1b6ff
And in a Dutch translation
http://www.waarmaarraar.nl/pages/re/5574/Drugsdealer_verwerkte_marihuana_in_snoep.html
(drugsdealer processed marihuana in candy)
On a Dutch forum users asking if anyone heard of drugs in candies given to schoolchildren (they link to a UK drugs forum)
http://www.drugs-forum.co.uk/forum/archive/index.php/t-24529.html
salaam.
a series of links which do not support your case reffer to different no herb based drugs and a different country.
Then you attempt to post this in dutch claiming it's about belguim yet it's actually reffering to Oakland and Emmleryville in the USA.
Ask your media.
I didn't say it is "prevalent" I say it happens and that they often use well known brand *names* = packing more than the actual product itself.
It was "in the news" in Belgium years ago. It was known in schools there as a problem to be cautious about years ago.
The article in Dutch actually reports that a dealer who produced such sweets has been convicted.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Summarising:
K. Affolter from a state in Oakland processed cannabis in a selection of candy and drinks. Federal agents found the products in shops in Oakland and Emmleryville. The suspect admitted he was the brain and producer behind the trade and employed 11 shopkeepers. He got 70 months in prison.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
One of the US articles goes about legislation set up to deal with these practices. If it is not a known problem why making legislation to punish it?
By the way, if you mail Nestlé or any other brand, I don't think they are keen to admit some of their innocent products might get doctored (if it gets doctored and someone made the effort to bring that to their attention) but maybe they do. You never know but I wouldn't commit suicidal PR.
salaam.
you end you claim with well you can't ask anyone else because they won't admit it because it's a consprisy you see.
I'm afriad this isn't debate or fact or even true.
It's made up nonsense and you have been shown up to be at best putting a brave front on it or at worse a naif...
Thanks for the long post btw, v. good.
