ymu
Niall Ferguson's deep-cover sock-puppet
Aye. The beautiful thing on the turn here is that they're both insuring me against the top end of the others range. If shortstack fish has the flush, then bigger stack can double me up back to a starting stack, and if bigger stack has the flush, shortstack's push is giving me the odds to call even if I know he has the nuts on the turn. 
I think it's about 60/40 on Villain2 having the flush here, accounting for Villain1's much wider range pre and post flop.
I don't hate Villain2's play. It's very early an STT, so raising up KQs over limpers preflop is a risky business but it's too good to fold and he has OK position on at last 3 limpers with a hand that plays very well postflop and is probably going to take the pot on a K or Q flop. The limp behind pre is fine. On the flop he has the implied odds to call with a flush draw and two overs, especially with 4 other villains there to possibly pay off a third heart. Raising a draw has a different risk/reward in tournies than cash, so I think the flat call is fine, given the opponents in the hand. You can definitely argue that his reverse implied odds and ICM demand a fold on this flop in $EV terms, but I think he can afford to see one more card at least.
Once he hits the nuts on the turn, he is pot-committed whatever happens on the river and whatever either of his opponents does. 3bet AI on the turn would have been better, probably, as I am clearly pot-committed at this point but could get away if a fourth heart hit, but he's clearly worried about losing me - my turn check showed weakness, and there is a small chance that a random would fold the weaker end of his range to a push. The flat call is deceptive and makes it a lot more likely that I will call him on the river without improving. I think he might be mimicking a fish here, rather than actually being one.

I think it's about 60/40 on Villain2 having the flush here, accounting for Villain1's much wider range pre and post flop.
I don't hate Villain2's play. It's very early an STT, so raising up KQs over limpers preflop is a risky business but it's too good to fold and he has OK position on at last 3 limpers with a hand that plays very well postflop and is probably going to take the pot on a K or Q flop. The limp behind pre is fine. On the flop he has the implied odds to call with a flush draw and two overs, especially with 4 other villains there to possibly pay off a third heart. Raising a draw has a different risk/reward in tournies than cash, so I think the flat call is fine, given the opponents in the hand. You can definitely argue that his reverse implied odds and ICM demand a fold on this flop in $EV terms, but I think he can afford to see one more card at least.
Once he hits the nuts on the turn, he is pot-committed whatever happens on the river and whatever either of his opponents does. 3bet AI on the turn would have been better, probably, as I am clearly pot-committed at this point but could get away if a fourth heart hit, but he's clearly worried about losing me - my turn check showed weakness, and there is a small chance that a random would fold the weaker end of his range to a push. The flat call is deceptive and makes it a lot more likely that I will call him on the river without improving. I think he might be mimicking a fish here, rather than actually being one.

