Donna Ferentes
jubliado
Because it will achieve nothing, settle nothing and satisfy nobody.shaneC said:Why would you not want an independent inquiry?
Because it will achieve nothing, settle nothing and satisfy nobody.shaneC said:Why would you not want an independent inquiry?
By 'cycnicism' do you mean 'demand for hard evidence'?shaneC said:9/11
I'm sure Mark Thomas can take care of himself. Always surprised at the level of cynicism from some on U75.

Excellent point.Brainaddict said:Sometimes evidence is inconclusive. Drawing conclusions from inconclusive evidence is stupid. So why not focus on things we do have evidence for? I saw and heard more talk of 9/11 conspiracy at the Green Fair than about the UK government's stitch-up on nuclear power. Hello? Priorities?
editor said:Excellent point.
I guess it's just a bit more exciting to be part of a gang who think they've discovered THE REAL TROOF about one of the biggest global events in modern times.
To be fair, nobody's ever obtained evidence for anything without first "harping on" about it until enough interest is garnered to make efforts to obtain that evidence.Brainaddict said:You don't have hard evidence. No one has it. Until you do have it, constantly harping on about it will get you nowhere.
But the vast majority of 9/11 TROOFERS aren't asking 'serious questions'. Their minds are already made up.poster342002 said:Jumping to conclusions over anything is wrong, but asking serious questions about soemthing is another matter entirely.

Anyone who's mind is 100% made up on something when the total facts are still unclear is making a mistake, obviously. That doesn't (or shouldn't) detract from the efforts of more intelligent, logical questioning from other people.editor said:But the vast majority of 9/11 TROOFERS aren't asking 'serious questions'. Their minds are already made up.
So, to get back on topic, do you think leaping on a comedian like Mark Thomas at a Green Fair in south London, ramming a video camera in his face and demanding to know why he didn't tell jokes about 9/11 is the way to go then?poster342002 said:Basically, just because some people are leaping to silly conclusions on a given matter doesn't invalidate the original question being asked.
Exactly. They're asking questions, then providing answers - all according to what they already believe.editor said:But the vast majority of 9/11 TROOFERS aren't asking 'serious questions'. Their minds are already made up.
Probably not the smartest approach, no.editor said:So, to get back on topic, do you think leaping on a comedian like Mark Thomas at a Green Fair in south London, ramming a video camera in his face and demanding to know why he didn't tell jokes about 9/11 is the way to go then?
beany82 said:Someone on the board mentioned how the green message was being hijacked by other causes. I’m sorry you feel this way. The entire fair was jam-packed full of educational and practical advice on how to live greenly. if there were issues such as taking Westminster to court or deaths in police custody was because it was held in the social justice zone. While we had a lot of green films and green speakers, I also wanted to ensure we shared the platform with local issues of social justice. Injustice the film highlights the importance of an independent enquiry, and we find out how the film has been blatantly censored by the police over the years check: http://www.injusticefilm.co.uk/filmfacts.html. Brian Douglas was a local man who died in police custody, his sister did the Q&A after the film, and I’m glad we gave them the platform as it is a relevant and an important issue still and definitely worth supporting considering the lengths that have gone into censoring it.
editor said:So, to get back on topic, do you think leaping on a comedian like Mark Thomas at a Green Fair in south London, ramming a video camera in his face and demanding to know why he didn't tell jokes about 9/11 is the way to go then?

What issue? That 9/11 was supposedly all a massive conspiracy that only the TROOFERS have got to the bottom of?poster342002 said:Probably not the smartest approach, no.
But the fact that some are handling this issue rather cackhandedly does not invalidate the issue itself as a whole.
teuchter said:I'm afraid that if I was sceptical about the importance of taking green issues seriously (as it happens I'm not and I do) I would very likely have arrived at the park, seen a lot of "hippy nonsense", enjoyed laughing at it all for an hour or so, and gone to the pub. Even if there were some very worthwhile causes buried amongst the other stuff.
No, just the more general questioning of 9/11 stuff. Obviously there are some very silly theories doing the rounds (such as the hologram planes one - was that serioulsy put forward, btw?), but healthy, rational and analytical questioning of the official line on it is something else entirely. Any society that stops asking "but..." and "why..." is not heading anywhere good, imo.editor said:What issue? That 9/11 was supposedly all a massive conspiracy that only the TROOFERS have got to the bottom of?
But you're missing the point. The whole 911 thing has been completely and utterly hijacked by the kind of TROOFSEEKERS we saw on Sunday who aren't interested in healthy questioning or even a proper investigation..poster342002 said:No, just the more general questioning of 9/11 stuff. Obviously there are some very silly theories doing the rounds (such as the hologram planes one - was that serioulsy put forward, btw?), but healthy, rational and analytical questioning of the official line on it is something else entirely. Any society that stops asking "but..." and "why..." is not heading anywhere good, imo.
That, sadly, can happen with any type of debate or movement or whatever. If everyone else just leaves the scene and abandones it to them, then it'll stay that way.editor said:But you're missing the point. The whole 911 thing has been completely and utterly hijacked
poster342002 said:That, sadly, can happen with any type of debate or movement or whatever. If everyone else just leaves the scene and abandones it to them, then it'll stay that way.
Don't spend your time on any of them if you don't want to. If a subject interests you, study up on it, investigate and discuss it. If not, don't. Sounds straightforward to me.rich! said:Right.
Which should I spend my time working on:
* climate change
* kennedy assassination
* people who believe NASA never went to the moon
* 9/11 junkies
?
), a stall on how to pimp your home - green style, lots of great food and had a chat with the Friends of the Earth guy. I did see quite a bit of alternative therapy stuff that I'm not interested in especially but just ignored it. There were plenty of people who were interested - so that's their business. I didn't notice the 9/11 people at all!!
I also agree the lack of alcohol made it a nice change from other events (although I did see some sneaky cider here and there!!
) I thought it was a nice mix and seemed to cater for a good range of interests - even though they might not have all been my own.Not if they start invading every website they can find to repeat their near-religious obsession, or start disrupting 7/7 survivors' meetings or, as in this case, accosting comedians as a ruddy green fair.poster342002 said:That, sadly, can happen with any type of debate or movement or whatever. If everyone else just leaves the scene and abandones it to them, then it'll stay that way.
editor said:ruddy green fair.
gaijingirl said:I must have selective vision. I saw and (really) enjoyed the funny bikes, the bicycle workshop (ok perhaps there is a theme here...), a stall on how to pimp your home - green style, lots of great food and had a chat with the Friends of the Earth guy. I did see quite a bit of alternative therapy stuff that I'm not interested in especially but just ignored it. There were plenty of people who were interested - so that's their business. I didn't notice the 9/11 people at all!!
I also agree the lack of alcohol made it a nice change from other events (although I did see some sneaky cider here and there!!
) I thought it was a nice mix and seemed to cater for a good range of interests - even though they might not have all been my own.
Id like to know if anyone liked the films and if they have any suggestions for next year. what else would you like to see included in the fair? if you thought the health area was too hippie what woud you like to see there instead?Yes, I was at that too.co-op said:I went to a showing of Oil, Smoke and Mirrors at the Ritzy a few weeks ago.
