Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Urban Election Called!!

guinnessdrinker said:
you are not very good at counting the letter s, are you....

Not really. Of coure i meant smear, but the phrase is being thrown around so casually that it seems to have lost all meaning and so confused me...:p
 
torres said:

I see, you're resorting to one-word replies now.

You're crap at presenting evidence. In fact, it's pretty laughable. Didn't they teach you this sort of thing in public school? :D
 
torres said:
Not really. Of coure i meant smear, but the phrase is being thrown around so casually that it seems to have lost all meaning and so confused me...:p

It's only "lost meaning" in your mind. :rolleyes:
 
torres said:
Not really. Of coure i meant smear, but the phrase is being thrown around so casually that it seems to have lost all meaning and so confused me...:p

was there only one smear, then? that's not much evidence against nino, is it? or are you the one doing the smearing?
 
guinnessdrinker said:
that's far less than you.

You have to bear in mind that brasic has a quota to meet. 98% of their posts MUST be sneering crap, or their overseer won't fork over the next installment of brasic's student loan. :)

E2A. Not that I believe "brasic" has a student loan, and I don't even believe the rumours that brasic parasitises from a partner, I just thought I'd use brasic's broad-brush staus-based insult technique back at 'em. :)
 
LOL!!!! You never quoted him, so it looked as though you were talking to yourself.

Oh and this

Not really. Of coure i meant smear, but the phrase is being thrown around so casually that it seems to have lost all meaning and so confused me..

The only one who thinks that the word "smear" is "being thrown around so casually that it seems to have lost all meaning" is you, as you are the one who stands accused of smearing. Though, I am not the only one who thinks that you're a smear artist.
 
The reply directly followed his and was clearly a reply as the content would show most people. I'm sorry if you found it confusing. That one you've just replied to didn't quote you yet you managed to work out that it was a reply to you. See, you can do it if you try!
 
Well I suppose this tit for tat between Nino and Torres is indicative of the reality of real elections and is thus sadly inevitable. Indeed maybe Nino and Torres are doing a theatrical critique of elections for our behalf. :D

Anyway please note new developments on new thread.
 
The E.A. said:
Well I suppose this tit for tat between Nino and Torres is indicative of the reality of real elections and is thus sadly inevitable. Indeed maybe Nino and Torres are doing a theatrical critique of elections for our behalf. :D

Anyway please note new developments on new thread.

Hardly, this isn't an "election", it's a popularity contest in which a clique of individuals here can rationalise their belief that they are superior debaters.

It's fraudulent and you're a fraud.
 
nino_savatte said:
Hardly, this isn't an "election", it's a popularity contest in which a clique of individuals here can rationalise their belief that they are superior debaters.

It's fraudulent and you're a fraud.

You seem to be under the impression that only members of this 'clique' that you keep going on about are able to vote. This is clearly not so.
 
Lock&Light said:
You seem to be under the impression that only members of this 'clique' that you keep going on about are able to vote. This is clearly not so.

Rubbish and no matter how you try and dress it up, this is a popularity contest and the voting reflects the clique-ish nature of many of the posters- yourself included.
 
nino_savatte said:
Rubbish and no matter how you try and dress it up, this is a popularity contest and the voting reflects the clique-ish nature of many of the posters- yourself included.

That's the first time I've ever been accused of being in a clique, nino. You're surpassing yourself, as always.
 
Back
Top Bottom