I dunno. Maybe I'm imagining it out of nothing, I get the impression you've some kind of moral objection to it. What else could this objection be based on other than a take on my lust, excess, greed, lazyness, and vanity. I'm prepared to accept you don't think envy or wrath to be particularly sinful. You may even regard those last two as virtues.
Unemployment soars..750,000 foreign workers in 2008
- Thread starter durruti02
- Start date
Pickman's model
sunset spires and twilight woods
er... it's a sunday so presumably he isn't posting from work
As I said, I don't care about it. I'm just pointing out that your actual life is wildly at odds with the Ayn Randist type gobshitery you espouse.
It's nothing new-fascists, self-styled ultra-individualists and would-be ubermenschen etc etc are almost always mediocrities.
Yes, yes, you end up saying this in response to everything. Nobody has mentioned sin.
More likely, your obsessive fantasising and posting about the same themes all day most days is where the sexual repression lies.
Is that what is is? I thought it was the sound of the sound of the bloke next door knocking one out into a cup.
I never said it was a sin.
What is this obsession with being the baddest ass in cyberspace? Your 'daring' views were passe in about 1809.
Dunno. What is this derogatory connation you imagine with obsession, masturbation and self delusion, etc? How did these values get so tightly bound up with your sense of identity that you're compelled to chastise these feckless meanderings? As for baddest ass, I maintain it's just your traditional beliefs that see them as bad. I'm just intrigued to draw 'em out.
I don't see them as bad. I see them as twattish.
As for the rest-you're repeating yourself again.
Have you had any luck with finding a new scriptwriter?
Yet more repetition.
It isn't so much these things in themselves which are twattish, just the idea that some middle-aged middle manager thinks he's shocking people by going on like a twitchy adolescent ubermensch all the time.
Look at how shrill he's being at the mention of the word masturbation.
I don't though. Even the shrill tone is conjured up by your imagination. You hear my voice. You hear voices in your head. It's common knowledge. Any road up, you imagine being "some middle-aged middle manager thinks he's shocking people by going on like a twitchy adolescent ubermensch all the time" is bad. You imagine repetition is bad. You'll likely post up "it's not bad, it's just boring". So boring you're compelled to give a polar response. It's no wonder you don't post up real political ideas, they'd be undermined by your apparent disabling mental disorder. You hear voices. You're a polar responder.
You hear my voice. You see me in your mind. I may be little and naughty, and in so doing I've made a bigger imprint in your deranged mind than you've made in mine. Tell us, how does your schizophrenia inform your politics? I'm not taking the piss in asking this, it's just that seeing as you'll always be at the bottom of the pile regardless of tightness in the labour market, you've got nothing much to add to the immigration discussion as far as I can tell.
Did it really take ten minutes to come up with that, Walter?
You could have simply re-arranged one of your thousands of other posts and posted that up in a matter of seconds.
Is that bad or just boring? Anyway, rather than throw random insults at me, enlighten us with an answer to a question which, I can tell you, genuinely fascinates many of us. How does your schizophrenia inform your politics? Like I say, I'm genuinely not trying to have a go in asking this. You'll always be the least marketable hombre on the block even if we made it as difficult for EU migrant labour as it is for the rest. So have you anything to add to the immigration discussion other than your mad insults like some troublesome tramp in the street?
Wolveryeti
Detty Pig
You two should just fuck and get it over with.
They're not insults, they're observations.
No-I've nothing to add for the benefit of an overgrown adolescent who regurgitates the same three hackneyed Nietzsche-isms no matter what the subject.
Think of more as a celebration. You're throwing a party in your head and I'm like a load of E turning up out of nowhere to get the thing really going. Oh yeah.
Oh don't do it for me. Do it for your many hundreds of admirers currently hanging off your every word.
Don't apologise durruti02. Tell us, if it became as hard for EU immigrants to "take our jobs" as it is for non-EU types, would that satisfy your requirements as far as addressing the problems caused by immigration (in itself) was concerned? Or do you want to make it even more difficult for non-EUers too?
you are 180o away from understanding where i am coming from .. i am arguing a positive position .. that emplyers employ local at the proper rate .. i don't give a ff where cheap labour comes form it is all wrong .. i have highlighted migration to show the process and how it has developed since thatcher so ( very generally ) 1) 1970s - full employment good wages job for life etc etc 2) 1980s this smashed army of unemployed 3) 1980-90s british cheap labour 4) 1990s-00s bosses need to screw wages even more and brits don't want it - immigration
Similar threads
