Bigdavalad said:![]()
Is it this photo?
A very obviously faked photo.
Bigdavalad said:![]()
Is it this photo?
tobyjug said:A very obviously faked photo.
Bigdavalad said:I know, it's fucking awful, there was a worse one in the thread I found that one, some Brit apparently outside a concentration camp we had built somewhere, complete with white background all the way round him.
FreddyB said:Shouldn't you be off somewhere bringing peace to the world with a gun instead pedalling a boys own adventure story version of the history of the British Army?
tobyjug said:A very obviously faked photo.
Ah the barbed whip of sarcasm!MC5 said:Obviously, the British armed forces are only interested in winning hearts and minds.
Bob_the_lost said:Ah the barbed whip of sarcasm!
“Trends were accepted. Leadership failed to provide clear guidance so we just developed it. They wanted intel [intelligence]. As long as no PUCs [Persons Under Control] came up dead it happened. We heard rumors of PUCs dying so we were careful. We kept it to broken arms and legs and shit.”
MC5 said:Obviously, the British armed forces are only interested in winning hearts and minds.
pin retaining said:Do you remember Bugis Street in Singers ? Raffles was much better years ago than it is now. How many monsoon ditches did you fall in ? ...happy days.
What credence can be given to the claim about explosives? Justin Raimondo writes that while initial BBC Radio reports acknowledged that the two men indeed had explosives in their car, subsequent reports from the same source indicated that the Iraqi police found nothing beyond "assault rifles, a light machine gun, an anti-tank weapon, radio gear, and medical kit. This is thought to be standard kit for the SAS operating in such a theater of operations"
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7366.
One might well wonder, with Raimondo, whether an anti-tank weapon is "standard operating equipment"—or what use SAS men on "a surveillance mission outside a police station" intended to make of it. But more importantly, a photograph published by the Iraqi police and distributed by Reuters shows that—unless the equipment is a plant—the SAS men were carrying a good deal more than just the items acknowledged by the BBC.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050923&articleid=989
Bob_the_lost said:The "global research" article isn't very well thought through. It does not ask any questions of the statements, and include the vaugely ridiculous idea that the USA are planting car bombs in people's vehicles. Especially with the example they use for it.
In 1985, authorized by William Casey, the CIA planted a car bomb near a mosque in Beirut to kill Sheik Mohammed Hossein Fadlallah, a muslim cleric. The bomb missed the Sheik but killed 80 people, including children.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/torture
The driver did leave in a hurry, but was soon alarmed with a feeling that his car was driving as if carrying a heavy load, and he also became suspicious of a low flying helicopter that kept hovering overhead, as if trailing him. He stopped the car and inspected it carefully. He found nearly 100 kilograms of explosives hidden in the back seat and along the two back doors.