See, I sound like a nobber when I say I write stuff in a day, staying up all night before it's due in to finish it, but it's actually true. Which, in turn, means when I get good marks it only reinforces that behaviour because I think my fly-by-the-seat-of-my-pants writing style is somehow linked to my achievement and if I take my time and put in more work I'll do crap. See. Nobber.

Oh god, I don't need much prompting![]()



Originally Posted by my lovely supervisor
This is extraordinary work - one of the best three or four essays I have
ever read at Keele in more than 15 years. With one or two revisions and a
little expansion here and there it could go straight into somewhere like
the Journal of American Studies (I'd appreciate the second marker's
thoughts on this). In a sense then, all I need to do now is to rise to my
feet, applaud, cheer, and throw my metaphorical cap into the air. This is
a hugely intelligent, incisive, stylish, detailed, perceptive,
knowledgeable and original piece of work. You were absolutely right to
leave Bourdieu as an implicit presence (though if you were minded to seek
publication for this piece I would be inclined to bring him back to the
surface a little). The material on The Intuitionist is not only wholly
persuasive, it is also hilarious. And you play what may be the great trick
of critical writing (which is not a trick in the end, simply the real
thing): you appear to be taking an oblique and slightly quirky approach
rather than writing a comprehensive 'essay on ... ' but you then show,
cumulatively and convincingly, that all the time you have in fact been
going right to the very heart of the issues. I am lost for admiration,
almost for words. Well done!

Then why didn't he give you more than 90%, the stingy git? Demand to know what happened to your missing 10%.
|I'm not surprised with the comments from your supervisorI nearly did a little wee when I found out![]()



See, I sound like a nobber when I say I write stuff in a day, staying up all night before it's due in to finish it, but it's actually true. Which, in turn, means when I get good marks it only reinforces that behaviour because I think my fly-by-the-seat-of-my-pants writing style is somehow linked to my achievement and if I take my time and put in more work I'll do crap. See. Nobber.

I'm exactly the same, except that I never do that well. You clever bitch![]()
![]()
![]()
Joe sends congratulatory kisses, extra slobbery!
That's wonderful.
Got to try and keep it up now, though!
Well done.
Well done VP, those comments are amazing.![]()
Hehe, thanks. I keep reading them and grinning lol


A little ego boost on days where it's all gone to shit!Awww
This may sound really fucking pathetic, but I still have the ace comments/essays from my degree, and read them every now and again to cheer myself upA little ego boost on days where it's all gone to shit!


My lovely supervisor: "Cos the blowjob wasn't that good."




Did anybody else make the classic Urban mix-up and wonder why Vintage Paw was congratulating herself all over again?Very well done. Congratulations! I remember how it felt getting marked at 86% for a paper I did for my masters. I'd have probably exploded if I'd managed to equal you and get 90%.![]()

It's not kained![]()


I think that was intentional![]()
Why? I'm obviously missing something here...
Kabbes misread "Violent Panda" as "Vintage Paw", so L_C said "Kained" instead of "Kabbes" as a joke. lol. rofl. etc.
Always loses something in the explanation.
I've so little self-awareness when it comes to my work I'm continually stressed out, convinced this time will be the time I'm shown up as a fraud!



