CyberRose
أرفع الشفرات
Sorry nino, not today mateYou've never had a "touch" and that's clear by your posts.
Even here you can maintain a grip on what you've posted before.
Sorry nino, not today mateYou've never had a "touch" and that's clear by your posts.
Even here you can maintain a grip on what you've posted before.

If social democracy & central planning is 'left' and neo-liberalism is 'right', then what is 'far-right' exactly?I separate ideologies into their economic and political aspects as I feel this allows for more accurate descriptions. In each of those aspects you have ideas ranging from the left to the right. UKIP's economic policies are far right, if you disagree, why don't you analyse their policies and tell me why my assertion is not true...
Who are you to decide what others see as right or left? FYI I would consider central planning to be far left, and I have no idea about the intricate details of neo-liberalism (and I doubt you do either) to place it on the left-right range.If social democracy & central planning is 'left' and neo-liberalism is 'right', then what is 'far-right' exactly?
Do I need to? I consider their economic policies to be far right wing. If you can't tell me why that is not true then I'm afraid I can't see you taking this argument any furtherCan you find me anyone ese who has labelled UKIP as economically 'far right'?
Actually I'd like to turn that round the other way if you'll allow me to. I have explained why I use the terms that I do, and it is done in quite a simplified way. YOU, however, are objecting to the use of a term based on YOUR understanding of it, because YOU do not want emotive language used because of how YOU think it describes UKIP.Seems like you just want to use emotive language instead of pin-pointing what *exactly* you object to about their policies.
FYI I would consider central planning to be far left,
I would describe it as simplistic, rather than narrowHuh? That's an extremely narrow view.
), far left communism (ie total centrally planned), far right would be laissez faire and extreme right would be anarchism again but with corporations taking the place of governments. Then obviously you have a mish-mash making up the centre ground I would describe it as simplistic, rather than narrow
In very simple (economic) terms, imo (which I'm sure others will disagree with and I will be the first to admit I don't know the technical terms for what I'm describing) extreme left would be anarchism (altho I think I've said before that could also be extreme right), far left communism (ie total centrally planned), far right would be laissez faire and extreme right would be anarchism again but with corporations taking the place of governments. Then obviously you have a mish-mash making up the centre ground
UKIP, economically, are to the right of the Tories, who are right wing economically, so that, imo, would make the far right economically
Never said it was...Narrow or simplistic, there is little difference. Central planning is not the sole preserve of the 'far left'.
Never said it was...
FYI I would consider central planning to be far left,
I'm pretty sure I read that policy in some communist leaflet once?A Flat Rate Tax Policy - where's that come then?
I meant a completely centrally planned economy would be far left (ie communism). But again, it's very simplistic and I acknowledge that there are many examples of these types of economy that we wouldn't necessarily label far left or communism (esp in the Arab world, altho perhaps in purely economic terms they would also be considered far left?)You said this, Mr Evasive.
The implication is clear.
I'm pretty sure I read that policy in some communist leaflet once?
Flat rate tax is to the right of the mainstream but hardly "far right" or "radical right" and doesn't break with a mixed economy. The c.20-odd countries that have flat-rate tax are hardly minimal government countries and still have plenty of government regulation of their economies.A Flat Rate Tax Policy - where's that come then?
My point was to distinguish between what I mean by "far" as opposed to what I mean by "extreme". Anything else was not relevant to the point I was trying to makeMost people wouldn't leave out 'left' and 'right'
You seem like an intelligent kind of fellow, can't you distinguish between typical "opposition" political rhetoric and actual policy?I have read the UKIP website. None of the quotes below indicate 'far right' strictly laissez-faire economic policies:
"we will encourage UK manufacturing so that we make things again"
"We will have a grammar school in every town"
"We will ... look seriously at reopening some rail lines that Beeching closed"
"we will bring in fair prices and fair competition for ... farmers"
source: http://www.ukip.org/content/ukip-policies/726-ukip-policies-in-brief
How about leaving the EU (and all the social and employment constraints on business) but maintaining a purely free trade agreement?In fact I can't see anything within the UKIP manifestos or websites that advocates what I would regard as radical or extreme laissez-faire economics
No offence but you haven't said above what exactly their policies are on the topics you mention above. I just have, and they don't appear to be very central like you are trying to make out (for whatever reason you are trying to portray this image of UKIP for...?)and in fact I can't see how they could advocate it given all their other policies on the NHS, schools, transport, welfare or giving help to various sections of the economy.
Well mixed economy can mean anything! And if they are to the right of the conservatives, but not extreme right where there is no government, can you see why I might chose something in the middle to describe them?They might be to the right of the current Labour and Conservative parties but they still advocate a mixed economy, which means they are not economically 'extreme right', 'far right' or any equivalent term you care to use.
In which case I suggest you don't criticise me for things you yourself are guilty of...This is 'in my opinion' of course, just as what you are posting is 'in your opinion'. So no need to get personally abusive about things.
I know, it was a (unsuccessful by the looks of it) hilarious attempt at sarcasm for the benefit of the other posters!I doubt that.

Flat rate tax is to the right of the mainstream but hardly "far right" or "radical right" and doesn't break with a mixed economy. The c.20-odd countries that have flat-rate tax are hardly minimal government countries and still have plenty of government regulation of their economies.
I know, it was a (unsuccessful by the looks of it) hilarious attempt at sarcasm for the benefit of the other posters!
Oh dear![]()
So would you describe UKIP economic policy as right-wing, far-right-wing or extreme-right-wing?And the mixed ecomony is a red herring as well. Fascist states had mixed economies, does classic fascist economic thought *and* the BNP support mixed a economy. Some socialists support mixed economies, soical democrats explicitly support mixed economies. It's not a defining characteristic of left or right or extreme/moderate.
So would you describe UKIP economic policy as right-wing, far-right-wing or extreme-right-wing?
Personally I'd say right-wing.