Dunno why everyone raves about the Germans being good on the motorways, they're terrible for tailgating.
The germans aren't too bad, the dutch are worse. I'm going to experience both tomorrow.
I do find in both Holland and Germany, people don't seem to view everyday journies as a race like they do here. There's more respect for other road users no matter if they are going faster or slower.
But in Germany I can be bowling along at 110mph,

have to be protected from the nasty cars with 20mph limits... but they should really only apply during school hours (plus a few hours each side to account for after-school activities). 20mph limits on roads outside schools that still apply at 3am are fucking ridiculous - what eight-year-old would be off to school then?But in Germany I can be bowling along at 110mph, go to overtake someone, in to the empty fast lane and a couple of seconds later a big BM or Merc is inches from my bumper with his lights flashing. Gets me thinking all anti-Germanic thoughts that does.
The German road death rate is higher than in Britain, but AFAIK it's no worse on the derestricted sections of the autobahn than elsewhere in the country, suggesting that high speed isn't the main reason.

From what I understand it's the non-motorway roads where the carnage takes place. No idea why.
It's probably less of a factor than it was, but I have heard it said in the past that the former DDR was the big problem since the roads weren't as good as in the west and a lot of drivers were inexperienced, at least with anything more powerful than a Trabant...
I'm going to be in the minority here and say I'd like them decreased. For example, and especially, the motorway speed lowered to 60mph. It would have the twin benefits of lowering the emissions from the exhaust, and massively decreasing the fuel usage, by approximately 20%.
i agree reduce all limits by 10 mph, loads of people are killed and injured in accidents with cars.
The problem is not just drivers though. Many pedestrians involved in accidents are at fault (even if the law doesn't allow for them to be legally so) too. The fact that almost invariably they're always going to come off worse off does not mean we should not try to improve their road awareness and behaviour.The main problem is the people doing the driving. What we really need (apart from better driver education) are dedicated traffic police armed with double-barreled coach guns.
I have a couple of bugbears; 1) raise the motorway speed limit to 80 to improve traffic flow, and 2) variable speed limits near schools. Yes, the precious little darlingshave to be protected from the nasty cars with 20mph limits... but they should really only apply during school hours (plus a few hours each side to account for after-school activities). 20mph limits on roads outside schools that still apply at 3am are fucking ridiculous - what eight-year-old would be off to school then?

Yes, it's a contributing factor. The percentage of blame is p to the investigating officer. The percentage blame is also used by the respective insurance companies in settling the claims. My ex had an accident at a notorious junction on the B1 in Dortmund (nicknamed kamikase junction). The police proportioned blame 30% to my missus and 70% to the pillock that hit her.If I remember correctly (usually the preface for some completely idiotic work of fiction), anyone on the autobahn who is exceeding a speed 'limit' is automatically considered to have contributed to an accident even if the accident wasn't necessarily their fault.
True or false?
Certainly the Germans are similar with their 'town signs' (yellow rectangles with the name of the town, on leaving the town they are crossed by a red line). IIRC the speed limits are signposted when entering a town but the relaxation is assumed on leaving the town unless there new speed limit is different for the type of road that you are on.The problem is not just drivers though. Many pedestrians involved in accidents are at fault (even if the law doesn't allow for them to be legally so) too. The fact that almost invariably they're always going to come off worse off does not mean we should not try to improve their road awareness and behaviour.
I don't have a problem with reducing speed to 20mph (25 would be a more logical decrease IMO) on small, residential streets, but not all streets within a town or city should be subject to such change by any means.
Speeds on motorways and some dual carriageways should be increased to at least 80. Then again some 60mph roads could do with a lower limit.
As an aside note, is the UK the only country in Europe that chooses not to sign their national speed limits? I.E., we don't have any speed limit signs with '70' written on them; only the white background sign with the diagonal line crossing it. I hate that. It's as if they think they'd be encouraging people to drive faster if they dare tell them the limit is 70 mph.
IME, cars with electronic ignitions exhibit very little change in consumtion v speed except on the 'in town' 30mph stop-start cyle. Certainly my last three cars (Chavalier, Megane and Astra) show virtually no variation in range no matter what method of driving I useI'm going to be in the minority here and say I'd like them decreased. For example, and especially, the motorway speed lowered to 60mph. It would have the twin benefits of lowering the emissions from the exhaust, and massively decreasing the fuel usage, by approximately 20%.
Having done cab driving at silly o'clock in the morning I would whole-hearted agree.Charming
Well, most primary and secondary schools by default are in built up areas, so the limit would only "revert" back up to 30mph for your precious 3am speed-fest.
Fine. Better than being stuck driving at 20 on an empty road, when the only reason you're driving at 20 is because of some kids who are all in bed.Charming
Well, most primary and secondary schools by default are in built up areas, so the limit would only "revert" back up to 30mph for your precious 3am speed-fest.