8ball
As seen on TikTok
I suppose percentage wise it isn't such a large growth, 400,000 on top of 64,100,000 ..
Fuck me - is it that many now?
I suppose percentage wise it isn't such a large growth, 400,000 on top of 64,100,000 ..
More than 50% of the growth was births exceeding deaths so you may have a point!I don't mind the immigration it's the coffin dodging I object to.

Population density
Netherlands: 1,057 people per square mile
UK: 660
Germany: 593
France Metropolitan: 295
USA: 83
Australia: 8
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_population_density

Yeah it must be awful for them, having one person per eighty four billion square miles![]()

On your earlier point about people generating jobs...Anyway, the solution is simple and it's one I've argued for many times before. We simply deport the entire population of Leeds, flatten the place and start again. Only this time, we'll populate it with actual humans![]()
What on earth is a food definition?That depends upon how you define overcrowded. For instance, by a food definition we're overcrowded: Britain cannot feed itself.
Not being funny, but can you not work it out? More people equals more stuff that needs doing and more people to do stuff.Can you expand on your "people generate jobs" point because I am not sure about that.
For example if that were true would not the countries with the largest populations, like India perhaps, have the largest economies ?? ... is that right? not sure ..
Ask yourself this. Why do people move from one place to another? In the main - people of working age.Not sure cynicaleconomy, they seem to have conveniently missed out a lot of countries, perhaps the other countries didn't fit the curve!
Not sure cynicaleconomy, they seem to have conveniently missed out a lot of countries, perhaps the other countries didn't fit the curve!
Sure I see that, but people have to have money, to pay other people to do stuff..Not being funny, but can you not work it out? More people equals more stuff that needs doing and more people to do stuff.
There will be a positive correlation between immigration and employment. People generally move from places with little work to places with more work.The chart is specifically about new EU countries; nothing convenient about it, just what they were focusing on. I'll keep looking for another chart but I would be very surprised to see any positive correlation between population and unemployment.
Have you looked up Spain? What's happening to the population there? Is there net immigration? How about Greece?Sure I see that, but people have to have money, to pay other people to do stuff..
There are plenty of places with lots of people but no economy because there are no jobs / money!
Spain for example ..
That wasn't the point though, the point was, people create jobs. Not incoming or outgoing, just people. There are plenty of people in Spain, but there are not jobs.Have you looked up Spain? What's happening to the population there? Is there net immigration? How about Greece?
To be brutally honest, you still haven't got the point at all.That wasn't the point though, the point was, people create jobs. Not incoming or outgoing, just people. There are plenty of people in Spain, but there are not jobs.
Have you looked up Spain? What's happening to the population there? Is there net immigration? How about Greece?
Sure, I have moved myself for work, many times.Ask yourself this. Why do people move from one place to another? In the main - people of working age.
A few generations ago there was a massive influx of people into the Welsh valleys for the boom that was coal. Now there are residual populations there but few jobs. Spanky's point was that people generate jobs, well in the valleys there are people a plenty but no jobs.ETA: To get a proper picture of what's going on, you also have to look in greater detail than just countries. There will be parts of Britain where population is falling.
And what has been happening to the valleys population since coal ended? Has it been going up or down?Sure, I have moved myself for work, many times.
A few generations ago there was a massive influx of people into the Welsh valleys for the boom that was coal. Now there are residual populations there but few jobs. Spanky's point was that people generate jobs, well in the valleys there are people a plenty but no jobs.
I think you are misrepresenting me. As I have mentioned now a couple of times Spanky's point was that people create jobs which I disagree with. Your point is that people are attracted to areas where there are jobs or words to that affect, that is a no brainer, a platitude, but it isn't the point Spanky made.To be brutally honest, you still haven't got the point at all.
platitude .. truismAnd what has been happening to the valleys population since coal ended? Has it been going up or down?
That wasn't the point though, the point was, people create jobs. Not incoming or outgoing, just people. There are plenty of people in Spain, but there are not jobs.
A platitude?I think you are misrepresenting me. As I have mentioned now a couple of times Spanky's point was that people create jobs which I disagree with. Your point is that people are attracted to areas where there are jobs or words to that affect, that is a no brainer, a platitude, but it isn't the point Spanky made.
Rubbish, I understand fine that people are attracted to places where there is work and motivated to leave places where there is no work.A platitude?
You brought up Spain. I predicted for you that Spain would be experiencing net emigration currently before looking it up. I was right. You don't seem to understand these mechanisms at all.