Your posts on this thread strongly imply that you support this bloke being prevented from traveling, if you don't believe that why have you been posting what you posting?
I was speculating as to why he had been stopped, and as part of that speculation I said there might be a possibility that gluing himself to a statue might not be the only thing on his record that made him stand out (as it turns out it appears he was one of the people charged with aggravated trespass on that power station so that was probably the reason). I don't particularly see anything controversial in asking the question of why he was stopped, do you?
And the reason I ask such questions, if only to myself, is to decide whether or not, as you point out above, I should agree with the decision to stop him. As the police merely questioned him then arranged for him to carry on to Copenhagen (so every single headline claiming this man was "stopped" from travelling is incorrect for a start!) then I see no reason to support preventing him from travelling as the police obviously know the facts, while the rest of us are left to speculate. Whether it was right for him to be detained (rather than prevented from travelling) I don't know, and neither do you, because none of us know the facts surrounding his detention.
Since you are expecting one though I'll just say that I really shouldn't be wasting my time with morons like you. I hope you feel vindicated now.
Good boy!
But you misunderstand my comments about people using insults!
I certainly do not feel like a victim in this forum! People who post here are just people off the internet who I will never meet in "real" life (if I did tho I'm sure we'd get on fine, but behind the keyboard a completely different side of our personalities comes out). So being insulted doesn't upset me, I find it quite funny actually.
The reason I mention about the insults is because it usually suggests the person using the insult has conceded defeat in whatever argument/debate they are having but don't have the bollocks to say so. The insults are usually the result of frustration from the poster about either being pwned in an argument or because they are simply incapable of coming up with a valid response to someone else's argument (altho a lot of people just have history and don't like each other!). Some people are just naturally horrible or they simply have poor social skills.
However, what I think is the most tragic are those people who insult from the start without even attempting to have a go at taking part in the debate/argument...
