Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

train station or railway station?

it's a...


  • Total voters
    57
No. You're looking for rules where non apply. What's important is tradition.

Yes and no. I meant to say that the only rule is 'if the person who says something and their audience understand it, then it's right.' Tradition's important, but if we stuck to all traditional meanings then conversation would be peppered with words that are considered offensive and / or archaic these days, and language wouldn't evolve.

All of which is too serious for a Friday afternoon thread.
 
But trains are stationed there, however briefly, railway is more of a constant that is always there.

As you go to catch a train and not a railway, a train station seems apt.
 
I used to go to school by train and I always went to the train station to catch them.

You can't call them a railway station, as the railway is stationed all over the place and not just at the train station.

So dodge's dad, like so many other dads, is clearly spouting a pile of bollocks.
 
This is one of the idiosyncrasies that make English so quaint.

Trains stop at railway stations (not train stations) whereas buses stop at bus stations (not road stations). That is all there is to it. Further argument or debate is futile.

“Train station” was a term almost unheard in Britain until about four or five years ago. Wherever the phrase came from, those that want to hear about train stations (and similarly inane drivel) can listen to Radio Five Live. Those who want to hear about railway stations can listen to Radio Four
.lol
Buses stop at bus stops though :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom