Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Tories and anti-union plans

As a low paid temp at a major bank I already make lots of 'mistakes' by 'accident'.

Actually the general contempt for work and the employer by pretty much every other temp is one of the few things that keeps me going tbh
the shredder is your friend :)
 
Its a really fucking stupid idea.

not from tory scum anti union perspective it isn't, this'll really undermine strikes in any unskilled/semi-skilled places, and even for some skilled jobs, at least until some agency numpty on minimum wage crashes a tube train because they didn't have full training or something. TUC unions gonna be totally fucked by this, probably won't even try to strike anymore, will be reduced to flogging insurance.
 
not from tory scum anti union perspective it isn't, this'll really undermine strikes in any unskilled/semi-skilled places, and even for some skilled jobs, at least until some agency numpty on minimum wage crashes a tube train because they didn't have full training or something. TUC unions gonna be totally fucked by this, probably won't even try to strike anymore, will be reduced to flogging insurance.

But the less 'pressure valves' and legal opportunity people have to strike, well...
 
It is a really stupid idea.

Productivity, efficiency etc. will be worse in the long term.

It's all about short term money grabbing and idealogical extremism.

Some watered down social democracy with powerful yet compliant unions is a far more sustainable model for capital.

...but they're not interested on the long term.
 
But the less 'pressure valves' and legal opportunity people have to strike, well...

Maybe, but if they make it really easy to sack people, then many/most will be too scared to do anything.
Though that's where the IWW model of outside organisers comes in handy - the visible organisers not being an employee, they can't get sacked.
We've been here before tbf, when unions started, and so we clearly can take action and have that action be effective, maybe just feels like it won't because (a) we're losing stuff, not gaining it right now and (b) the TUC unions are such ineffective beasts when it comes to doing anything remotely radical, due to fear of losing their shiny offices.
 
I think it's remarkable how the left is basically in the same position it was in before about 1900. TUists a small minority of the w/c, regular threats to TU rights, lack of w/c representation at a national and local level, no w/c political party. Obviously there's substantial differences, but the task that faces us is surely the same one that faced people back then? Rebuild political and industrial organisations to further our interests, reestablish these in our communities, start achieving small victories, defend the basic rights people have won over the last 100 years. We basically have to start over again don't we?
 
It is a really stupid idea.

Productivity, efficiency etc. will be worse in the long term.

It's all about short term money grabbing and idealogical extremism.

Some watered down social democracy with powerful yet compliant unions is a far more sustainable model for capital.

...but they're not interested on the long term.

Yes, if they hammer the unions too hard, then the unions become not just ineffective but pointless, and i think they'll soon find out the role that the TUC unions have had in disciplining the workforce - persuading people to not take things into their own hands, to wait for union negotiations, etc. Its not that i'm predicting loads of wildcat strikes or organised action - except in the industries in which such action already happens on a semi-regular basis, and outside the very limited influence of more radical groups - but i think there'll be a big upturn in "mistakes" at work, people going off sick because of stress, individuals kicking off or walking out of workplaces, stuff like that.
 
Yes, if they hammer the unions too hard, then the unions become not just ineffective but pointless, and i think they'll soon find out the role that the TUC unions have had in disciplining the workforce - persuading people to not take things into their own hands, to wait for union negotiations, etc. Its not that i'm predicting loads of wildcat strikes or organised action - except in the industries in which such action already happens on a semi-regular basis, and outside the very limited influence of more radical groups - but i think there'll be a big upturn in "mistakes" at work, people going off sick because of stress, individuals kicking off or walking out of workplaces, stuff like that.

The thing is, outside of the public sector, the unions are already dead. About 9 in 10 workers in the private sector are not in a union.

So unions already have no say in what happens in most workplaces.

As far as I can see this legislation is mainly aimed at the RMT who have used strikes (and mainly the threat of them ) to leverage better pay and protect terms and conditions.

The plans pose problems for them but a bigger problem for unions is their dying relevance and their inability to organise outside of their public sector ghettos.
 
You can tell how seriously the Tories are taking something by who they've given the job to. Javid is singularly useless, which suggests either they're just having a punt at it and aren't that bothered, or that they think it's going to be a walkover. Possibly a bit of both.
 
You can tell how seriously the Tories are taking something by who they've given the job to. Javid is singularly useless, which suggests either they're just having a punt at it and aren't that bothered, or that they think it's going to be a walkover. Possibly a bit of both.

Yes, plus it plays well with their mates in the media who don't like tube strikes.
 
Even if you ignore that fact that it's a blatant attempt to make strike breaking easier the Agency thing is still a proper cunt's trick. parasitical bastards that they are, I've depended on agency work a few times. This would make it very difficult - there's no way I would ever cross a picket line so I'd have to turn that kind of work down but then the agency would suspect I was a militant trouble causer (and even if they didn't put two and two together they don't like it when you turn down work) and suddenly find themselves 'unable to find work' for me. And would the job centre class it as turning down work if you were registered with an agency and refused to scab?

at present you can't be sanctioned for refusing to cross a picket line, but shh, they might not have realised
 
I think it's remarkable how the left is basically in the same position it was in before about 1900. TUists a small minority of the w/c, regular threats to TU rights, lack of w/c representation at a national and local level, no w/c political party. Obviously there's substantial differences, but the task that faces us is surely the same one that faced people back then? Rebuild political and industrial organisations to further our interests, reestablish these in our communities, start achieving small victories, defend the basic rights people have won over the last 100 years. We basically have to start over again don't we?


Unite Community are doing their bit.
 
Back
Top Bottom