MR. BLAIR: I think that – three points I would like to make here. The first is that I think,
whether for reasons to do with concern over global warming or for reasons to do with concern over
energy security and supplies, I think this issue is coming together in an important way. It’s there now on
the agenda and I’m pleased about that. I think it’s very important.
The second thing, though, is that I think – and I would say probably I’m changing my thinking
about this in the past two or three years. I think if we are going to get action on this, we have got to start
from the brutal honesty about the politics of how we deal with it. The truth is no country is going to cut
its growth or consumption substantially in the light of a long-term environmental problem. What
countries are prepared to do is to try to work together cooperatively to deal with this problem in a way
that allows us to develop the science and technology in a beneficial way.
Now, I don’t think all of the answers lie in just – in developing the science and technology, but I
do think there is no way we are going to tackle this problem unless we develop the science and
technology capable of doing it.
And that really brings me to the third point, which is I think the point that you were really raising,
which is, well, how do you create the forces that drive people then to develop the science and technology?
How do you create the markets and the research and the development of this technology so that we can
shorten the timeline so that we’re not waiting 25 or 30 years to develop fuel cell technology, so that, for
example, in nuclear fusion, which is now a major issue as well we are developing the technology, so that
you can bring those costs of wind power and solar power down?
How do you do that? And I think that is the issue that the international community needs to
address because we tried at Gleneagles to try and – some people have signed Kyoto, some people haven’t
signed Kyoto, right. That is a disagreement. It’s there. It’s not going to be resolved. But how do we
move forward and ensure that post-Kyoto we do try to get agreement? I think that can only be done by
the major players in this coming together and finding a way for pulling their resources, their information,
their science and technology in order to find the ways of allowing us to grow sustainably?
And the meeting that will take place on the 1st of November, which is effectively the G-8 of the
India, China, Brazil, South Africa, and Mexico. That is going to allow us, I hope, not to negotiate
international treaties, but to allow us to start beginning the necessary dialogue as to how we are going to
shorten these timelines for developing the science and technology and how we are going to ensure that
countries like China and India, as they grow – and they will grow.
And they are not going to – they are not going to find it satisfactory for us in the developed world
to turn around and say, look, we have had our growth. You have now got yours so we want you to do it
sustainably even if we haven’t. So they aren’t going to demand, in my view, some process that allows us
to share the technology and transfer so that we can benefit collectively for the work that needs to be done.
And the real issue I think – because to be honest, I don’t think people are going, at least in the
short term, going to start negotiating another major treaty like Kyoto. The real issue is how do we put
these incentives in the system so that the private sector, as well as the public sector says, this is the
direction policy is going to go, so let’s start getting behind this. So that is what – I think it’s a key issue.
