editor said:I haven't taken issue with you not liking the song, neither have I "jumped all over you" in this thread.
You have taken issue with me not liking it - that guff about prog rock, and that bigger guff about 'some people liking it being enough'. As for jumping over me, that's a more general point
editor said:I've simply taken issue with you dismissing the song for not being 'professional' enough for your presumably demanding tastes
so by implication, you have 'undemanding' tastes. Is that a good thing?

editor said:If you don't like the song - fine. Feel free to pop up on my enthusitic thread within minutes to tell me if you must. You've certainly done that enough times in the past.
As have you, editor, as have you. It's the double-standard that's annoying me. You do it as much as I do. Let's see how long it would take for you to pop up on a Chumbawamba or Cardiacs thread? But would I get irked by it? No..
editor said:But all this stuff about the song not being "done "properly" or being "unsophisticated" just smacks of music snobbery to my ears.
It's not snobbery, it's just my opinion. I think it's a lame copy of a much more interesting genre.
But sorry for daring to disagree


Mawkish, histronic, self-piting, I know people who never got into Radiohead because of it.

