Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

This Is England

The way Meadows uses his "actors" (quite a few are just untrained lads/lasses) and the made-up dialogue, ad-libs etc can put some people off I find. Personally I like the style.
 
None of the people I've ever seen in Shane Meadows films can act. They are all crap actors, apart from that rubbish Midlands cowboy one, which actually had Ricky Tomlinson and a half-decent cast wasted on dreck. He either has a decent story ruined by ham-fisted amateurs, or a half-decent cast wasted on... oh, wait I've said that bit.

One day he will make a decent film.

Until then he is an underachieving, tremendously, unfathomably overrated tosspot.

Er, Paddy Considine?

Dead Man's Shoes?

Why am I even bothering to reply?

Rubbish!
Only kidding.

Nothing special (him) and rubbish (it).

Because you deep down suspect you have got it all wrong and want me to tell you why?

The way Meadows uses his "actors" (quite a few are just untrained lads/lasses) and the made-up dialogue, ad-libs etc can put some people off I find. Personally I like the style.

this might be it.

the acting in meadows' films is unlike anything i think i've seen on film - including loach/leigh. it's epitomised by considine's half-swallowed east mids drawl - there are some accents you hardly ever hear (Fens, is another), partly because the diction is really indistinct. the performances meadows gets are a strata of realism beyond anythiing eles - which sometimes gives scenes an awkward pace, or makes significant dialogue under delivered.

but that isn't bad acting. that's truthful - and it's the holy grail for actors - but one that you're rarely encouraged or liberated enough to pursue.
 
this might be it.

the acting in meadows' films is unlike anything i think i've seen on film - including loach/leigh. it's epitomised by considine's half-swallowed east mids drawl - there are some accents you hardly ever hear (Fens, is another), partly because the diction is really indistinct. the performances meadows gets are a strata of realism beyond anythiing eles - which sometimes gives scenes an awkward pace, or makes significant dialogue under delivered.

but that isn't bad acting. that's truthful - and it's the holy grail for actors - but one that you're rarely encouraged or liberated enough to pursue.

neutral.gif
 
spanglechick and Flashman have both hit the nail on the head. What for spanglechick is 'ultra-realistic' is for me hollow and flat-fallen.

He fails to engage me.

The accents are a non-issue.
 
Some of the scenes in his films are as near to perfect as I've ever seen. Particularly the bridge scene near the start of This is England. But tons of bits.
 
Oh yeah? Well I hate him and he sticks in my craw.

The OP defines this as a 'Meadows is crap' thread.

All you eulogisers should go elsewhere.

He is a talentless buffoon and should go back to film school and study the modules on 'driving a storyline'.
 
Some of the scenes in his films are as near to perfect as I've ever seen. Particularly the bridge scene near the start of This is England. But tons of bits.

Look at my tears. I mean just fucking look them. There's one over there, another one there - i think there's one rolled under the fridge as well.
 
I was also pretty dissapointed by it.

It was like a devised theatre-in-educaiton piece with decent actors but with no real understanding of the issues they are trying to address or the social historical context in which the film is set.

The main proble i have with it is the utterly unrealistic depiciton of the skinheads.

We have woodys gang of touchly feely skins who talk freely about their emotions and are totally non-racist. Suddenlty into their midst comes psyco racist skin and it as if hes from another planet. There a particulalry cringeworthy bit where he shocks them when he says 'the're was this fucking ... I'm gonner say it! .. fucking paki!' . But 'paki' was an everyday word in those days - and still is in many parts of the country.

Skinheads - by the early 80s - were cloesly associated with the far right. Not all of them were card carrying fash but many of them were openly and enthusiasticlly racist and those that weren't were ambiguous at best. The exception to this was groups of avowedly ant-facist skinhead groups (associated with Red Action I think) - but these were overtly political
and I'm not sure if they were much in evidence in 1982 .

Whilst not all skins were racist and/or nazis, the whole culture was rooted round machismo - and fighting was a central part of that. At gigs and football matches you'd get groups of skins up for a ruck - and you made sure you steered well clear of em. Again woodys group bare absolutely no relation to that.

And i didn't like the way psycho skins racism was explained away as him being fucked up by his family background . Therefore he's full of rage and hate - thats why he becomes a nazi. Too pat and totally divoreced from any social political context. It also serves to make him a 'freak' - not like us nice non-racist people. Far more interesting would have been making Woody the racist nazi.

Basically I think meadows is doing a totally rose tinted spectacles job and , whilst he is great at doing gritty but sensitive stuff about young peoples in particular (like the excellent 24/7) - his political understanding seems to very limited, and this was very much exposed in 'This is England'.
 
It was like a devised theatre-in-educaiton piece with decent actors but with no real understanding they are trying to address or the social historical context in which the film is set.

The main proble i have with it is the utterly unrealistic depiciton of the skinheads.

We have woodys gang of touchly feely skins who talk freely about their emotions and are totally non-racist. Suddenlty into their midst comes psyco racist skin and it as if hes from another planet.
Yep agree with all of this.
Basically I think meadows is doing a totally rose tinted spectacles job
Badly, with a trowel and a big fist of ham.

Why oh why oh why oh why oh why is he so revered? :confused:
 
The psycho skinhead was an integral part of the plot. I like the way the film changes when he turns up. I like the fact that the psycho is quite smart and manipulative as well, it would have been too easy to make him thick. It would have been a fairly uneventful film without the psycho.

What struck me about that character was that I knew several blokes like that - made me shiver in recognition
 
We have woodys gang of touchly feely skins who talk freely about their emotions and are totally non-racist. Suddenlty into their midst comes psyco racist skin and it as if hes from another planet. There a particulalry cringeworthy bit where he shocks them when he says 'the're was this fucking ... I'm gonner say it! .. fucking paki!' . But 'paki' was an everyday word in those days - and still is in many parts of the country.


The point is that COmbo was 'back'. He was obviously there before, arguably he wasn't the same as he is now. People had changed Combo for the worse, arguably Woody, Milky and Co for the better. So it could be looked at as either Combo reminding a few of their previous 'outlook' or disappointment at Combo's new outlook.
 
Re: the film being criticised as anachronistic - it was set in the Midlands - fashion/subculture took their time establishing themselves in the provinces - I was 9 in Leeds in 1982 and I remember older skinheads quite clearly
 
What struck me about that character was that I knew several blokes like that - made me shiver in recognition

One of the reasons the film made a big impact on me was that the Combo character was very much like a friend of mine growing up, very much like him.

I aint seen him for nearly fifteen years - because I couldnt put up with the bullshit he increasingly believed - but as a mate he was one of the best Ive ever had.
 
This is England may be historically inaccurate in parts, dodgy actors or whatever but it's a film that definately grips the viewer and shocks them (the ending just blew me away). I like films like that, therefore just for that reason alone it's a good film IMHO.
 
Yes it seems that much of the naysaying is from people who are nitpicking about its precise historical 'accuracy'. But in my view, the film was never attempting to be accurate in that way, it was showing things from the eyes of a child turning into a teenager.

And we all know (just from arguing on Urban) that how we saw things when we were teenagers is immediately dismissed as 'wrong' by people who were good enough to be 10 years older at the time

:)

It's a great, great film, and no amount of "It's shit" is going to convince me otherwise.

Even my brother likes it, which is the ultimate benchmark, as he is like Dub x 10 - he says every film is shit, pretty much.
 
Yes it seems that much of the naysaying is from people who are nitpicking about its precise historical 'accuracy'. But in my view, the film was never attempting to be accurate in that way.

But its not nitpicking - hes called the film 'this is england', its explcitly about skinheads, racism and identity and is very deliberately set in 1982. It is then majorly wrong in its depiction and analysis of it subject matter. Thats not 'nitpicking' - its a fundementally flawed film. Watch 'Made in Britain' or 'Scum' and then compare.
 
I didn't see this film when it was released in the cinema although i meant to catch it and was please when i saw Film 4 was showing it.

I started watching it, it seemed to be in the style of Ken Loach, a modern-day "Kes", a coming of age film, good pace, good editing touching little stories some funny bits,i thought i was going to really enjoy this film but then we have the abrupt introduction of the psycho skinhead from prison and the film suddenly becomes about him, all interesting bits and humourous bits gone, just pretty boring, the original central character pushed to the back-ground, unrealistic story-lines, just crap.

The film seeemed to be pretty inaccurate, this film was set some time after 1982 after the Falkland's War, yet i remember, 1980 as being the year of Skinhead, by post 1982 we were all into Boy George and New Romantics, not a skinhead insight, the NF completely dead, perhaps "up North" were in a fashoin time lag, or perhaps this film was just crap and inaccurate. i seriously don't know what all the fuss was about!:confused:

Another totally dull and unrealistic film from Shane Meadows. 1out of five.:rolleyes:

No idea why this guy was banned, I'm sure he committed some sackable offence. But anyway I have to agree. Not a great movie, totally unrealistic. Completely overrated, as is Shane Meadows. Why is he so sanctified on these boards - serious question - ive seen pretty much all hes done and hes well, ok. thats it. Not shit, not great. I'd give this movie a 2.5/5.

Anyway, was the OP banned for dissing Saint Shane? Or somethin else? :hmm:
 
Back
Top Bottom