They look like they're for children.


They look like they're for children.
Plus they're Nike, so they're over-priced double shit.
they're not anymore expensive than similar trainers.



Unless they were stolen I wouldn't wear them, gave up wearing Nike in the nineties and advise others likewise. It's like one of those sharklike BMW cars.
If you're wearing/driving them you look like a cock.
It's not the brand itself, it's not even the look, it's the fact that anyone who would be proud to buy into that whole shite ethos.
You end up looking like one of those terrible Dutch white rappers from the eighties who try their hardest but fail miserably to accurately capture the gritty look they're aiming for.
My![]()
suit you then.
fuck me, they're a pair of trainers not a fucking lifestyle.



Awesome comeback. I'm reeling
There are some pretty cool sweat shop free trainers, or at least from less dubious companies than Nike that are more in the sort of colours you said your other clothes where in
http://www.wornagain.co.uk/
http://www.ethicalsuperstore.com/products/no-sweat/?gclid=CKjBns79lJICFQHD1Aod81xW-w
See what I did there? lured you into ethical consumerism through the medium of fashion and colour co-ordination
But if you're not bothered about such things and you're not particularly fussed about having Nike for the label alone, I reckon you could get something cooler and loads cheaper from somewhere a bit more generic like Topman or somat
they are NOT trainers stoopid.![]()
they are trainers.
those ethical shoes are shit..

plus ethical capitalism is for wiberal wankers.
but I reckon you could still get something cheaper and better elsewhere, unless you want to buy nike cos you're a label junkiewrong. nike make loads of great trainersPlus they're Nike, so they're over-priced double shit.



...but only if you're Rodriguez http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Ammy-ZxuF8Y
ok if you play bass for The Klaxons or sumfink