dilute micro
esse quam videri
absolutely terrible film this. Completely missed the point of the original book.
What was the book about?
absolutely terrible film this. Completely missed the point of the original book.
saw this tonight and i have to say that i thought this was a superb film, great performances that i found compelling, fantastic soundtrack that added to the sense of drama and intention, beautifully shot and flowing edit so that 2 and half hours flew by, intelligent movie making that drew me in completely and allowed a story to unfold that didn't feel the need to slap you about the face to make its points. i can't think of many better films i've seen for years gone by, i can't agree with some of the criticisms here, it drove me and pal to the pub to discuss for an hour and half afterwards cos we were so excited about what we'd seen. top top stuff imo.
absolutely terrible film this. Completely missed the point of the original book.
yeah - bodysong - awesome film and scoreJust saw this on iplayer and thought it was superb, I wish I'd seen it on the big screen. Brilliant soundtrack, has Jonny Greenwood done any other film soundtracks?
Considerably less than the sum of its parts.
I thought it was exactly the sum of its parts.

What is Andersons style?
A bit of everything really. It's hard to pin him down to one particular style. Each film has been so different to the other.

That's more or less exactly what strummerville said in his post which you edited down to one sentence.![]()
I'd beg to differ though. His first four films were indebted to Robert Altman's cinema, though he increasingly moved from Altman's naturalism to something more stylised. There Will Be Blood was a clear break and feels more like a film by a classic US iconoclast like Orson Welles.
Bullshit. Punch Drunk Love owes nothing to Altman.
In any case, I didn't say that to put down Anderson, there is nothing wrong with learning from a personal hero.