It was meant to be intrusive. It was the rare soundtrack that went beyond just underlining the emotions of the film and thereby telling the audience how to feel. It often made the viewer question what they were seeing, throwing them emotionally off balance, which for me was its brilliance. It almost becomes a character in itself.
We'll just have to agree to disagree I suppose.
It was meant to be intrusive. It was the rare soundtrack that went beyond just underlining the emotions of the film and thereby telling the audience how to feel. It often made the viewer question what they were seeing, throwing them emotionally off balance, which for me was its brilliance. It almost becomes a character in itself.
We'll just have to agree to disagree I suppose.

Thanks for the lengthy edit after I'd replied![]()

I didn't think it fitted at all. It was intrusive and didn't reflect what was going on.. IMO
It does reflect what is going on, especially after the boy becomes deaf and stops talking, the sound I think is used to express his perspective -- it is very well done.
I've only listened to the soundtrack (couldn't face 3 hours in the Ritzy!) and it blew me away - it's the whole of C20th modern classical in a small box...you can hear Ligeti, Stockhausen, Crumb and others in there, but he lifts it beyond that.
Had no idea the boy Greenwood was *that* talented!
I was talking specifically about the beginning, though..
You mean the first twenty minutes or so where he is shown toiling in the mine and there is no dialogue? I thought the sound there was meant as a kind of persistent inner monologue and also underlined his tenacity.
) sounded anachronistic, but not in an interesting way.I've only just come across this thread. I turned down the offer of going to see it today...I think I made the right choice.
I have a problem with noises...apparently it's very common in people who were premature babies...the soundtrack sounds as if I would have found it excruciating. That's why I tend to get rat-arsed in noisy environments, it's literally painful otherwise.......

You might right about the intention behind the soundtrack; i just didn't think it worked very well. It detracted from the movie, especially in the first hour, in my opinion. I certainly never felt off-balance regarding what i was seeing; i was just thinking "What's with all the fucking noise?" Especially since, with so many of the mining scenes, they had such great natural sounds to work with.It was meant to be intrusive. It was the rare soundtrack that went beyond just underlining the emotions of the film and thereby telling the audience how to feel. It often made the viewer question what they were seeing, throwing them emotionally off balance, which for me was its brilliance. It almost becomes a character in itself.
You might right about the intention behind the soundtrack; i just didn't think it worked very well. It detracted from the movie, especially in the first hour, in my opinion. I certainly never felt off-balance regarding what i was seeing; i was just thinking "What's with all the fucking noise?" Especially since, with so many of the mining scenes, they had such great natural sounds to work with.
Two of my friends who saw it with me felt the same way, and others leaving the cinema were making similar observations. Maybe i was just spoiled by No Country for Old Men. I love the extended silences in that film, and they worked much better at creating atmosphere, IMO.
Anyway, There Will Be Blood was a great movie, i thought. Day-Lewis's performance was superb and sustained--he was in just about every scene in the whole movie. It was long, but i didn't think it was too long. And the cinematography and direction were outstanding. It could be argued that some of the greatest film composers from Bernhard Herrmann to Ennio Morricone created "intrusive" scores where the films are almost constructed around musical themes, giving them a stylised, operatic feel and the same is the case here. it would be boring if all films were the same.
I still prefer No Country for Old Men overall, though, and am glad it won the big Oscars. I just found it a slightly more compelling movie.
iwhile i love pt anderson, (
PT Anderson is IMO a genius. Simply the greatest film maker around at the moment.....all IMO of course.

Finally got around to watching this the other night.
Was completely underwhelmed.
Disappointing as I was looking forward to it.
Just found it a little dull really. Maybe I missed something.
It was beautifully shot for sure and I did like the very minimalist soundtrack, but the events and story left me cold.
Oh well.
