Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The World Chess Championship 2006: Kramnik v Topalov

Donna Ferentes said:
Mine isn't. Try clicking on some things.
Ah yes, you have to click on the second bit of text on the white box for it to do something, not exactly obvious. The PlayChess version is better though. You can watch the GMs commentating...
 

Arturchix (Observers): I think the
position is draw but in current
position I'd better believe that
Topalov can win, not Kramnik.
Black has a passed a pawn after
all.
Robo-Tal (Observers): Bf3 played
Phantasy (Observers): hm, was
steckt hinter Lf3?
Arturchix (Observers): Plan to
play Rfc1
Super_GM (Observers): Rd8 Rfc1 a4
e3 a3Nbc4
Super_GM (Observers): why did
topolav go into a queenless
middle game??
Mieza (Observers): changing
knights is a posibility too
Rhilll (Observers): +0,2
Super_GM (Observers): Rfc1 Be5 de Nd7 Bc6
Bc6 Rc6 Ne5 Rc5 Rb8 Re5 Rb2 Rea5 Ra5 Ra5
h6 e3 =
Super_GM (Observers): Rfc1 Ne5*
 
Hmm none of the commentators in that excerpt are "officially" GM according to PlayChess, but Super_GM for example is rated 2600+ on PlayChess
 
Dongiovanni, dunno if that's just his username. Some other ones EduardNemeth and Holger_Lieske, who has just hinted in a humourous manner that this looks like a draw :(
 
Yasser Seirawan is providing an audio broadcast. You do get big names on playchess Donna - Nigel Short is a regular blitz player - but probably not as many as ICC.
 
After 19 moves, Nc4 seems the best, with a possible b: Nxe6, w: Nxe6 b:a4. That pawn is kramnik main concern. Topolov is pinning kramnik's bishop Re1 would free up that situation but at the expense of a better move. All the early pressure is topolov's.
 
What's hard about positions such as the current one is that they're not about sheer calculation: they're about making decisions between various options - do I give up my bishop for knight, do I push the a-pawn another square - which all seem roughly similar (and, what's worse, all slightly inferior) but may in the long term be very different, one option leading to a declining position and the other holding a draw. It's often in these situations rather than wild tactical positions that it takes the most time to come to a decision.
 
Donna Ferentes said:
What's hard about positions such as the current one is that they're not about sheer calculation: they're about making decisions between various options - do I give up my bishop for knight, do I push the a-pawn another square - which all seem roughly similar (and, what's worse, all slightly inferior) but may in the long term be very different, one option leading to a declining position and the other holding a draw. It's often in these situations rather than wild tactical positions that it takes the most time to come to a decision.

The real question to be asked is what would you do in this situation. With my substandard knowledge of the game I would go for Nc4. It adds protection for the knight on the e file and threatens 'that' pawn.
 
So he's played 24.Rc1 instead.

Note that while White's bishop now looks a bit diminished on d1, it's playing an important role in restraining that a-pawn.
 
I can't help feeling (which is obviously a very long way from knowing, it's just chessplayer's instinct) that Topalov's not got it right over the past few moves. If white does get the knight to d3 I think the a-pawn's in trouble and although I said earlier that the resulting ending would be hard to win, it might be rather easier now that Black's pawn structure's been weakened by the g-pawn's advance.
 
Back
Top Bottom