"The white working classes are discriminated against on a range of different fronts, including their accent, their style, the food they eat, the clothes they wear, the social spaces they frequent, the postcode of their homes, possibly even their names. But they are not discriminated against because they are white,"
Moslty agree with this - however ...
I do communtiy work on social housing estates in East Leeds. Part of my brief is 'promoting community cohesion'. To me this means forging and developing common interests between working class people from different ethnic, cultural, national background - this ranges from doing 'cultural exchange' type stuff between young people or womens groups - day trips, workshops, sports tournament -whereever the common interest is - to forming and supporting residents acitons groups with representatvies from all the communtiies in the area
So we've had a WWC womens group doing a sereies of quilt and dressmaking workshops with a refugee womens group - no real problems, the women enjoyed it and learnt new skills and the refugee women were helped by the other women with their english (particualrly slang and swearwords!).
The reason I mention this is becase I get so pissed off with so many commutniy organsations and local authorities equating 'communtiy cohesion' with 'improving equality outcomes' for BME (black, minority, ethnic) groups.
So you get heatlh and educational outreach programs for pakistani and bangladeshi womone or youth clubs for young men of African/Carribean origin. Yet the white working class people - who live in exactly the same estates and suffer from the same lack of services and many of the same access issues - are excluded.
Inevitably the comon peception is that 'everything' is being done for 'immigrants and ethnics' - tbh I'm suprised that the far right isn't doing better than it is becasue this plays directly into their hands.
The problem is that inequality indicies contrast the minorioty groups agaisnt the national average. White Working Class people are generally not included as a 'minotiy group' so are classed as part of the 'white commuinity' as a whole - so their lack of educational achievment, poor access to adult learning, their poorer health, their lack of communtiy facilites etc gets overlooked.
The other problem is that large areas of funding have 'improving equality outcomes for BME communties' as part of their tick box critereia.
So by looking at inequality issues through the parametres of ethnicity rather than class, twenty years of social planning and community funding has been busy institutionalising segreagation and effectively discriminating agaisnt the white working class.
The answer is not - as the BNP prmote - for the WWC to pitch in with their own demands for a slice of the 'ethnic minority pie' but for a systamtic recognition that class is the defining factor in determining inequality before anything else and - ultimitely - for the working class of all backgrounds to unite and fight for their common interest.
Yes racism and culutral factors do play a part - i.e women of south asian origin do suffer beacsue of patriarchial attitudes within their own culture and wider racism but it is primarily their poverty (i.e their class position) that exacebates these factors - not the other way around.
There is belated recognition of these factors from many people within the communtiy and voluntary sector - but (surprise surprise) this tends to be from workers on the ground not at the senior levels of managment or policy makers.