It proved that people have always complained about dissolute youth. This isn't news. It didn't investigate their claims further, or most importantly, examine the extent of such behaviour. Nor, perhaps most importantly of all, did it have anything to say about the changing consequences of thuggery. T
All it did was get a bunch of pissed up ne'er-do-wells to quote yesteryear's condemnation of pissed up ne'er-do-wells. As a technical exercise (ie, in getting the scallies to memorise and repeat chunks of antique language) it was mildly impressive. Beyond that it was very depressing; most of all in its fueling of the thugs' self-justification. I'd call it reckless if it wasn't for the knowledge that hardly anyone would be watching it.
Claiming that nothing ever changes and that today's odious anti-social thuggery is some universal constant is lazy a-historical nonsense, most frequently offered by metropolitan elites who don't have to endure the consequences of such behaviour. To suggest that mindless brutality is synonymous with liberty is downright idiotic, and suggests that producer and subject are well suited to one another.