Dylan has often angered fans precisely because he refuses to be what they want him to be.


What's the album with him and an orchestra called? Someone was telling me that's the one to go for...
I see it as a bit of a conceit, stringing loads of simpletons (not you obviously) along into thinking he was godlike in his mercurial nature, his essence so ephemeral that you could never quite pin him down, it's all a bit pompous and humourless isn't it.
Only a supremely vain man would allow other people to consider him that way.
.
Hi Ska,
It's "Self Portrait".
More info here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self_Portrait_(Bob_Dylan_album)
The bloke even finds time to paint.
![]()
I see it as a bit of a conceit, stringing loads of simpletons (not you obviously) along into thinking he was godlike in his mercurial nature, his essence so ephemeral that you could never quite pin him down, it's all a bit pompous and humourless isn't it.
Only a supremely vain man would allow other people to consider him that way.
And yes, of course, that being said, if we were talking about an Artist that I liked, I would see all of these traits as positives rather than negatives.
I'm sorry to wade in here with my shitty attitude. I just take it as a given that if you wanted an un-critical appraisal of Dylan, you would do it on one of his many fan Bulletin Boards. He's also a sacred cow that's been generating anger in me for some time for reasons unknown. Grrr.

Blood on the Tracks has been on my desert island discs list for at least ten years now and I'm yet to find anything that has a hope of replacing it.
Listened to Tangled up in blue last night whilst twatted and loved it.
This morning I feel slightly ashamed, like I snogged my best friend or something.
Dylan now enters my guilty drunken pleasures list, along with the Beatles and MacDonalds.
Thanks for that. That's a great performance of an iconic Dylan track.
Check out this live performance of Isis. From 1976. Dylan at his raggedy best

Thanks for that. That's a great performance of an iconic Dylan track.
Check out this live performance of Isis. From 1976. Dylan at his raggedy best

I'm sober now, no fucking way, sorry.![]()
![]()
From the same tour, a brilliant version of![]()
Hahaha I don't know whether to love you or hate you. I love your turmoil though.

incredible lyricist crap painter dire singer
quite innacurate i think.
in reverse order:
he's not a great singer, fer sure. And his voice now is very weak and each album must take an age to record. It is still highly expressive and filled with emotion. Generally he hits the note he means to, and is in key. That makes him, well, a much better singer than me, or Geri Halliwell at least.
Crap painter? tbh, if he was anyone else, and I saw one of his paintings on a market, or somewhere, I'd be tempted to pay a small amount for them. They're okay,nothing special, but have a charm and warmth that could look nice in the spare room. Okay, I'd have to have quite a lot more money than I actually do to hang a real painting in the spare room, but one can dream....He's a very average painter, no more nor less.
Incredible lyricist? Well, my only problem there is that it is not enough. He's an incredible song-writer, not mere lyricist. it is the way the words interact with the music that makes the songs so superb. Take Lily, rosemary & the Jack of Hearts. That could be made into such a weary number, but the music gives it a depth and vigor that many a lesser artist wouldn't be able to manage. So much of the early work especially has a playfullness that is often overloooked in Dylan, especially by his copyists who want to extract every last drop of 'meaning' (bleurgh) from every line of every song. y'know, the twats who'd argue 'Wriggle Wriggle' is an essay on bush's vacillation in the face of iraqi re-armament in the late eighties...
Bob Dylan uses language and music in a super-sophisticated way.
No, he really doesn't
