Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Qur'an

I dunno I didn't see it, but it's not a stretch of the imagination that an Imman who thinks women who haven't been cut&sewn are 'whores' could also say that it's justified within the Qu'ran.

An Imam is not necessarily a scholar and one who says such utter nonsense has even no clue about such a fundamental issue as Al Qur'an. .

salaam.
 
An Imam is not necessarily a scholar and one who says such utter nonsense has even no clue about such a fundamental issue as Al Qur'an. .

salaam.

Well he's a Muslim, so deal with the fact your fellow book followers aren't all as enlightened as you are.
 
Which bits didn't you find objective?

I felt it was engineered purely to make the chosen interviewers, or at least those that identified as fully adhering to the teachings of the Koran, to be nothing short of raving extremists.

I don't know why but I didn't expect such blatant one sided journalism from Ch.4

What side's that on??

TBH I don't think it exist :rolleyes:
 
I dunno I didn't see it, but it's not a stretch of the imagination that an Imman who thinks women who haven't been cut&sewn are 'whores' could also say that it's justified within the Qu'ran.

Yep, thats just about what was said in the programme. A woman who has had this done is less likely to be adulterous.

Good programme.
 
Fascinating programme. The range of opinions wasn't really shocking.

Tariq Ramadam's comments right at the end were very poignant, I thought – and something we might all do well to think about (about going out, learning, studying, and continuing to try to change things for the better).

Yeah, that guy was a dude. Great range of opinions and interpretations IMO, it gave a good insight into how the written word can be interpreted almost any number of ways according to the need/desire of the interpreter. It was also interesting to see the books themselves, what beautiful artifacts they are.
 
El Jefe said:
I think that's a fucking outrageous thing to say. Not only is it over-generalised but you're blaming a diverse mass of inviduals for what is mostly a topdown system.

Magneze said:
What does this post add to this thread? Certainly no human happiness or knowledge.

Aldabaran said:
You should retract that.
I'm here enlightening the whole lot of you and in the meantime the occasional Arab/Muslim/Islam haters can happily attack me too. All for free and with great love from me.

Yeah of course I was talking bollocks and I retract it. I just got really affected by that FGM scene. I'm still thinking about it. It just made me so angry that I was punching walls and kicking furniture. I hate being shown things as a passive spectator and yet be utterly powerless to do anything about it. I'd rather remain in blissful ignorance. The frustration of seeing such, well, evil (about the only word that does it justice) made me lash out (verbally).

As for it all being top-down, I'm not sure about that. I think that there needs to be a resevoir of willingness for these ideas to take root. The middle east is willingly walking toward fundamentalist theocracy - mainly because political action has been suppressed there for so long and religious expression has been the only permissable route to political change.

I really want a time machine so I can go back and give Lloyd-George a good fucking kicking - the welsh cunt! :mad:





;)
 
Sorry to our jewish contingent on here, but IMV male circusmcision is mutilation.

In fairness if you travelled around the xtian world comparing the Bible as a book to how it's interpreted you'd see much the same thing. Probably the same with the Buddhists (I wasn't aware that the Sarin bods in Japan were a Buddhist sect). It's what happens when religion and politics travel in the same cart, something you Mr Idaho should be very, very aware of.

Er, isn't male circumcision permitted/sanctioned in Islam?
 
It is a pointless non-point, since you're the only person to make a comment about it suggestive of that.

No, it isn't, you left any reader in no doubt that the practice of male circumcision is unique to Judaism. It is not.

Sorry to our jewish contingent on here, but IMV male circusmcision is mutilation.

Will you address the same point to our Muslim contingent too?
 
Thats uneccesary and all :rolleyes:

Oh come on! It was just a joke. Lloyd-George did balls up most of the middle east/Ireland/Turkey/Greece with his dubious partition plans. The welsh bit was just a bit of nonsense. The whole world is made of glass today.
 
Oh come on! It was just a joke. Lloyd-George did balls up most of the middle east/Ireland/Turkey/Greece with his dubious partition plans. The welsh bit was just a bit of nonsense. The whole world is made of glass today.

If you wouldnt describe someone as a 'Black Cunt' or a 'Jewish Cunt' etc then dont describe them as a 'Welsh Cunt'.
 
If you wouldnt describe someone as a 'Black Cunt' or a 'Jewish Cunt' etc then dont describe them as a 'Welsh Cunt'.

Sorry. Full fucking retraction.

I'd like to go back in time and give Lloyd-George a good kicking - the cunt, who happened to be welsh.

Is that ok?
 
I felt it was engineered purely to make the chosen interviewers, or at least those that identified as fully adhering to the teachings of the Koran, to be nothing short of raving extremists.

I totally disagree. I thought it portrayed those who choose extreme interpretations as somewhat extreme (which they clearly are!) but plenty of others who fully adhere to the teachings of the Qur'an as being perfectly normal people with religious belief.
 
<considers pm'ing a feminazi to come over and have a hissy fit about use fo the word cunt>:p

Ok - re-retracted:

I'd like to go back in time and give Lloyd-George a good kicking - the earth-rapist, who happened to be welsh.
 
Watched some of it and rather enjoyed it although thought it skipped over quite a lot of issues concerning FGM. There are Islamic scholars who do try and justify it. To just write it off as nothing more than an African cultural thing does nothing to try and deal with the real horror that is going on now.
 
No, it isn't, you left any reader in no doubt that the practice of male circumcision is unique to Judaism. It is not.



Will you address the same point to our Muslim contingent too?

Since the Muslim contingent of 1 on this board didn't ask me to, no. And again, you're the only person who's either said that it leaves no doubt only jews circumcise, or indeed raised the point at all.

You do this a lot dude - pick silly fights. But just for you...

Muslims mutilate boy's cocks for religious reasons as well as Jews. So do lots of WASP types in North America, especially Conneticutt.

Better? Got me anyone else I should mention who practice infant circumcision for non-medical reasons?
 
Since the Muslim contingent of 1 on this board didn't ask me to, no. And again, you're the only person who's either said that it leaves no doubt only jews circumcise, or indeed raised the point at all.

You do this a lot dude - pick silly fights. But just for you...

Muslims mutilate boy's cocks for religious reasons as well as Jews. So do lots of WASP types in North America, especially Conneticutt.

Better? Got me anyone else I should mention who practice infant circumcision for non-medical reasons?

I'm not picking fights, silly or otherwise. It seems to me that your understanding of the cultural practice of male circumcision is limited at best.

Oh and accusing me of "picking fights a lot" smacks of desperation as well as exaggeration. Perhaps you've heard of the the maxim "People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones"? You're rather fond of the odd scrap yourself, Kyser, so don't play the holier-than-thou.
 
Watched some of it and rather enjoyed it although thought it skipped over quite a lot of issues concerning FGM. There are Islamic scholars who do try and justify it. To just write it off as nothing more than an African cultural thing does nothing to try and deal with the real horror that is going on now.


Now, i'll say this slowly shall I? Yes some Islamic scholars clearly and openly defend FGM. But the point is they do so from a position they have arrived at as their is absolutely no justification for FGM from or in the Qur'an. As such it's important to make it clear, that FGM is contrary to Islamic teaching, it is not defended by the Qur'an and as such those Imams/Scholars who try and defend it are defending unIslamic practises.
 
Now, i'll say this slowly shall I? Yes some Islamic scholars clearly and openly defend FGM. But the point is they do so from a position they have arrived at as their is absolutely no justification for FGM from or in the Qur'an. As such it's important to make it clear, that FGM is contrary to Islamic teaching, it is not defended by the Qur'an and as such those Imams/Scholars who try and defend it are defending unIslamic practises.


So if its so clearly not a part of the Qur'an why do these Scholars openly defend it as being Islamic ? Is it in one of the suras (probably spelt that wrong so apologies ) ?
 
So if its so clearly not a part of the Qur'an why do these Scholars openly defend it as being Islamic ? Is it in one of the suras (probably spelt that wrong so apologies ) ?

Because what was a cultural pracitise in various parts of the world has become intertwined with religious observance. In the same way the differences of interpretation of whether women should wear the veil/burqa etc. That too-in what were desert areas-made sense for people, it also becomes/became intertwined so it went from a social/cultural practise to being intertwined again with religious observance.
 
Back
Top Bottom