Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The power of manipulative photography..

Kameron said:
60900187.nuisance.jpg

Like this one may be?

Hello! Something looks very familiar there. I never understood if that sign was there for the attention of certain local residents or, because there were a lot of old folk close by :D

An intriguing part of town.

Is there a story behind this photograph?
 
Stanley Edwards said:
Is there a story behind this photograph?

Yeah!

I can see it!!!!

Notice how everyone bar one member is wearing jeans...chino-projection you see?

That's why it intrigued you...a chino_obsession if you will...notice the fine cut and rouching of the groin?...how there is a little white dot on the lower part of the central subject's flies?... that is repeated by the vacated space withinin the letter "O" of the word 'NO' ?...see how your eye is drawn up and down through the central vertical axis of the only person in the shot looking vaguely like a letter "O"...ie the person with no hair...so you are semantically contsructing. via the central subject's head..."O"...to the chin of this character...to the leter "O"...then downwards to the "chin"...and then further down to the remarkable highlight of the groin once agin...another "O"...or even an "OH!!!!"...so you have upwards and downrds o_chin_o_o_chin_o..back and forth...up and down down and up...


clever stuff eh?:D
 
boskysquelch said:
Yeah!

I can see it!!!!

Notice how everyone bar one member is wearing jeans...chino-projection you see?

That's why it intrigued you...a chino_obsession if you will...notice the fine cut and rouching of the groin?...how there is a little white dot on the lower part of the central subject's flies?... that is repeated by the vacated space withinin the letter "O" of the word 'NO' ?...see how your eye is drawn up and down through the central vertical axis of the only person in the shot looking vaguely like a letter "O"...ie the person with no hair...so you are semantically contsructing. via the central subject's head..."O"...to the chin of this character...to the leter "O"...then downwards to the "chin"...and then further down to the remarkable highlight of the groin once agin...another "O"...or even an "OH!!!!"...so you have upwards and downrds o_chin_o_o_chin_o..back and forth...up and down down and up...


clever stuff eh?:D

Nonsense, I was there when that photograph was taken. It is the annual dinner of the local stiltwalkers club and the guests are waiting outside for the van to arrive with the stilts so they can enter via the door on the left. That is why the no nuisance sign is so high. Stiltwalkers are a nuisance as we all know.

H ;)
 
boskysquelch said:
Yeah!

I can see it!!!!

Notice how everyone bar one member is wearing jeans...chino-projection you see?

That's why it intrigued you...a chino_obsession if you will...notice the fine cut and rouching of the groin?...how there is a little white dot on the lower part of the central subject's flies?... that is repeated by the vacated space withinin the letter "O" of the word 'NO' ?...see how your eye is drawn up and down through the central vertical axis of the only person in the shot looking vaguely like a letter "O"...ie the person with no hair...so you are semantically contsructing. via the central subject's head..."O"...to the chin of this character...to the leter "O"...then downwards to the "chin"...and then further down to the remarkable highlight of the groin once agin...another "O"...or even an "OH!!!!"...so you have upwards and downrds o_chin_o_o_chin_o..back and forth...up and down down and up...


clever stuff eh?:D


Indeed - quite an impressive "reading" of the photograph Squelch :cool: :cool:
 
ZUL said:
Well Derian and Mauvais I'm sorry for posting a NSFW link. I guess I didn't realize that is wasn't cool to do. I'll refer to the TOS.


And why should I care if two posters and a moderator are overreacting to a comment that was made in a cynical thread titled: How thick do you have to be???
Depends.

On how badly you want your user tag line to be "Banned", because, from where I sit, you're looking very much like the kind of content-free pain in the tits than normally ends up banned before his postcount gets into triple figures...
 
Back
Top Bottom