Gingerman
Is a great bunch of lads.....
Jonny Wilkinson is another likeable down to earth sportsperson,coulda been a huge Beckham- type superstar after the 2003 Rugby World cup but was'nt interested.
The Official "Can Murray Win Wimbledon?" Thread
- Thread starter slaar
- Start date
TheHoodedClaw
acknowledging ur soup leg
Agreed, although to be honest any time I've heard Beckham speak he comes across as a thoroughly nice guy - living in a bit of a madhouse fishbowl at times - but still kind of decent. Scholes is a given and also Ryan Giggs - announced his marriage in the Times and that was that.
Gingerman
Is a great bunch of lads.....
If you ignore all the bollox surrounding Beckham he dos come across as a nice bloke, agree about Giggs and Scholes as well.
Yeah TBH I think the star factor side of Beckham just came from marrying Posh. I'm pretty sure that if he hadn't, he'd be similar to scholes and so on...
TrippyLondoner
Well-Known Member
You'll eat your words if he wins it now. Only nadals injured.
Do you actually follow tennis, out of interest?
TrippyLondoner
Well-Known Member
Murrays ranked 3rd in the world or something like that(dunno if its changed since i last checked recently)and looks unbeatable at most times.
TrippyLondoner
Well-Known Member
He's still quite young, btw.
Bollocks.
starfish
No dialogue. Just plot.
Dont get this Murray isnt a nice bloke stuff. We Scots love him 
. He just come across as a seriously determined sportsman, who happens to be bloody good at what he does.
Federer used to act like a spolit brat when he was younger but changed, some might say grew up. Even he will admit that.
Part of the problem is because until Henman/Rusedski came along we were all Borg, McEnroe, Connors, Lendl(me anyway), Becker fans. Britain had noone to cheer for so we got out of the habit.
. He just come across as a seriously determined sportsman, who happens to be bloody good at what he does.Federer used to act like a spolit brat when he was younger but changed, some might say grew up. Even he will admit that.
Part of the problem is because until Henman/Rusedski came along we were all Borg, McEnroe, Connors, Lendl(me anyway), Becker fans. Britain had noone to cheer for so we got out of the habit.
Talking out of your arse, he's never bottled a match, he's famous for not doing that.
Probably best if you leave the sport forum ya daft cunt.
Anyway, I'd be surprised if Federer didn't win this. Reckon Murray will make the semi's at least.
Eh? He's now won more titles than anyone in British history, at the age of 22, including a handful of Masters tournaments.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/te...-after-beating-Rafael-Nadal-in-Rotterdam.html
You're talking nonsense.
Pickman's - Yes, you're quite right. My mistake.
Nah, not gonna happen
London_Calling
Pleasant and unpatronising
Nadal is such an excellent player and such a presence, it's a great shame.
Why do people keep saying Federer's old? He's only 27! 
T & P
|-o-| (-o-) |-o-|
He could and might well choke (it's happened often enough on Grand Slam tournaments) but he has to be the best player left at the tournament after Federer, and the most likely man on his half of the draw to reach the final. He's also proven once he can reach a Major final without choking (US Open).
He could have a bad day at the office and go out early of course- but that is true of everyone.
goldenecitrone
post tenebras lux
Against my better judgement I'm going to change my prediction to a Federer - Murray final. Good luck Andy.
London_Calling
Pleasant and unpatronising
goldenecitrone
post tenebras lux
The top two seeds then - where did you pull that crazy prediction out from
Sometimes you've just got to go crazy. Might put 50p on it down at the bookies.
Similar threads
