I'm given to understand the Tory head office line at the mo is with a political leadership the council doesn't need a CEO. Councillors, whose average age is 68 or something, are in it for social status and ideological conviction and can sack and appoint the CEO if they so choose. Indeed, when the political complexion of the council chamber changes the CEO's position usually becomes untenable and they retire.
Not so much in the metropolitan areas maybe, out in the regions where 40% of households rely on a public sector income, local government is used as employer of last resort. The resulting incompetence and turpitude is a matter for the overview and scrutiny committee and the Audit Commission. I agree it's far from some super fantastic model of participative democracy, at the same time it's a reasonable enough aggregate of the electorate's values to head off calls for much in the way of structural change.
So are bar staff. So's everyone. The idea that people at "the top" have less integrity than their subordinates is a bit boy scout really. The seven deadly sins again.And council bureacrats are often highly incompetent or corrupt or both.
They dont manage to get all the way to the top by either telling the truth or getting elected.
Not so much in the metropolitan areas maybe, out in the regions where 40% of households rely on a public sector income, local government is used as employer of last resort. The resulting incompetence and turpitude is a matter for the overview and scrutiny committee and the Audit Commission. I agree it's far from some super fantastic model of participative democracy, at the same time it's a reasonable enough aggregate of the electorate's values to head off calls for much in the way of structural change.
