I'm no fan but he is the least likely actor to gurn. If anything, his face hardly ever moves and that's why he used to be considered a wooden actor when he was younger.That Clint Eastwood movie where he does nothing but gurn ludicrously.
Oh wait, that's all Clint Eastwood movies.
Showgirls is my favorite bad movie ever and that's because some aspects of it are very good. The screenplay is ridiculous and Elizabeth Berkley gives a thoroughly bizarre performance. But Paul Verhoeven is a great director, the film looks great, is well paced and it's very entertaining. It's never clear how far his tongue is in his cheek but many of his other films have been great bad-taste satires. And without Berkley's go-for-broke performance and the many WTF lines, the film wouldn't be half as fun.Showgirls
Jesus Christ Superstar
Both bafflingly shit but I feel drawn to rewatch them occasionally.
Showgirls is my favorite bad movie ever and that's because some aspects of it are very good. The screenplay is ridiculous and Elizabeth Berkley gives a thoroughly bizarre performance. But Paul Verhoeven is a great director, the film looks great, is well paced and it's very entertaining. It's never clear how far his tongue is in his cheek but many of his other films have been great bad-taste satires. And without Berkley's go-for-broke performance and the many WTF lines, the film wouldn't be half as fun.

I have come to chew bubble gum and kick ass.... and I`m all out of bubble gum

Put the glasses on !

The plot and acting are fine for what the type of film it is. The best thing about it is its political satire. Even if you think the film is bad, "so bad it’s good" implies a film that’s so atrocious that it has a freakish appeal because of its sheer awfulness.Yes it does in this case... the plot is pretty shit... the acting terrible.. the only thing that saves it is some nice imagery![]()
I remember watching this in the cinema