Significant how? With Sgt.Pepper, they opened the door for all sorts of prog rock hippy wibblers to bang out any old over produced pretentious self indulgent hoary bollocks. That's significantly unforgiveable in my book. The Monkees did great timeless pop songs. That's what I call significant.Idaho said:The Monkees did some good songs, and I listen to them more often than I do Beatles songs. However the Beatles were more creative and far more significant.
There's loads of young and old musos from all sorts of fields who cite Sgt Pepper as a hugely influential and massively significant album.copliker said:Significant how? With Sgt.Pepper, they opened the door for all sorts of prog rock hippy wibblers to bang out any old over produced pretentious self indulgent hoary bollocks. .
bluestreak said:the best thing about the monkees was that when they started writing their own songs they were still great, jsut a different type of great. they were the worm that turned, a product of the industry that turned aroud and said that they weren't gonna play any more unless it was on their turns. and the industry was forced to do it their way.
plus, the monkees tv show was great for kdis and popularised a lot of radical ideas in surreal tv.
plus, HEAD shits on anything the beatles did ever. four words: ditty diego war chant.
but also porpoise song and randy scouse git need to be heard by the detractors.
goldenecitrone said:You should get some of Milli Vanilli's stuff. You'd obviously adore it.![]()

goldenecitrone said:Comparing the Monkees to the Beatles is like comparing Martine MacCutcheon to Edith Piaf. And not in a sexual way.
bluestreak said:oh, and the monkees only recorded TWO albums of other people's songs. they made six or seven under the original line up. a majority of their output was their own.

goldenecitrone said:Comparing the Beatles to the Monkees is like comparing Lobster Thermidor to a dog shit sandwich. So yes, it is a matter of taste.
bluestreak said:i'm
not
your
steppin
stone.
not a single track the beatles ever did can match the sheer perfection on every level of that tune.

I know. It is entirely unacceptable.editor said:There's loads of young and old musos from all sorts of fields who cite Sgt Pepper as a hugely influential and massively significant album.
So what? IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO WROTE THE SONGS! I'm not asking who were better songwriters. but who were the better bandSunspots said:The original line-up released six studio albums, none of which feature more than half of the songs written by members of The Monkees. On most of those six albums, it's only about a third of the songs.
I wish it weren't the case, but it is.
![]()
Orang Utan said:I listen to the best of The Monkees from time to time, but never the Beatles - their songs were sweet and catchy without being cloying, whereas the Beatles.....yechh.
Am I talking shit?
Orang Utan said:So what? IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO WROTE THE SONGS! I'm not asking who were better songwriters. but who were the better band


hipipol said:comparing the Minkeys to Ol Blue Eyes, well thats a fucking SHOCKER!!!!!!!!!!!


Sunspots said:The original line-up released six studio albums, none of which feature more than half of the songs written by members of The Monkees. On most of those six albums, it's only about a third of the songs.
I wish it weren't the case, but it is.
![]()