Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Mist - A Poor Offering - Spoilers

are happiness and redemption what people seek in a horror movie?


I'd say no, they want something else from horror movies

This is a have your cake and eat it movie - people want some cheap thrills and then be able to go on about how profound it is.

I think my point covers lots of films - people think just because the image gets burned into their heads with violence that it is more 'true'.

Its no more true than beauty.
 
Why?

Why is it that you assume that misery is more profound than happiness or redemption?

I've made no such assumption. If I'm going to watch a horror movie, which I rarely do as I am not a fan, then I hope to be challenged and scared by the content thats all I'm after.

When I was kid I loved the genre but now being old enough to know that in the movies the fuckers usually get away coupled with this decades offerings being fairly terrible, I just don't get what I want out of it anymore.

Now the mist I agree wasn't profound at all, it was however a well done bit of b-movie horror with a shock ending that worked well to effect a bit of much missed emotion. Simple as, surely :confused:
 
I thought it was gonna be seen as phophetic when the LHC was turned on and seen as a classic, oh well !!!
 
Yes...that's because they are about monsters.

Aye, but a good horror movie can have you care about the characters. As with Romero's zombie films, the threat here was as much fellow human beings as the monsters. I thought The Mist showed pretty well how humans can react under fear and pressure. It's been a while since I was so happy to see a film character get their comeuppance. ;)
 
It's a typical Hollywood B Movie really.

It didn't have the tension of the short story... but then few film adaptations actually manage to successfully convey the suspense to be found within the written original
 
actually, I don't know why he didn't use the ending from the book

that finishes off with just him and his boy driving off alone... (you have to read it to appreciate it - it's a good open ending anyway)

Weird, you'd think from the shawshank redemption that this director would have preferred that too. I guess he just wanted to do something opposite to what people expected. Because of shawshank I thought this would have an uplifting fluffy ending and instead I just went 'argh'.
 
actually, I don't know why he didn't use the ending from the book

that finishes off with just him and his boy driving off alone... (you have to read it to appreciate it - it's a good open ending anyway)

Sounds a lot better.

The film ending is just a nasty trick.
 
Weird, you'd think from the shawshank redemption that this director would have preferred that too. I guess he just wanted to do something opposite to what people expected. Because of shawshank I thought this would have an uplifting fluffy ending and instead I just went 'argh'.

Shawshank would have been much better if Red had got to the field at the end and found nothing.
 
You're just a soppy old romantic! Brutal endings are ace.

Soppy is getting your emotional workout through bug films.

I've got no problem with brutal endings - I wouldn't change the end of 'Lilya4ever', 'The Vanishing' (Dutch version natch), or even ET and those three really upset me. If it calls for it then so be it.

This one didn't.
 
It would be great as a short film I reckon! Twilight Zone style.

I actually thought The Mist would have worked better in this format. As the movie went on too long and was really boring in parts. I'd also guessed the end about 20 minutes before it happened, which I blame on how drawn out it was.

If it had been done as an episode of Twilight Zone or the Outer Limits it would have been a classic.
 
Back
Top Bottom