Orang Utan
Maybe I like the misery
They're not quite as boring as the Star Wars films, but the comparion is valid.
Ah ha ha. Ah ha. Ah ha ha ha.
No. Stop. You're killing me.
Please, no. Stop.
Have you considered a career as a professional comedian ?

Really? Personally I prefer the films to the book, but I love the scouring - it's all about how war affects everywhere. It's a bit odd how they come back to hobbiton in the film and everything's completely normal.

I think you are a dick because of your opinion also![]()
not being serious mate, I knew you weren'tExcept I didn't call you a dick.

no, just someone who couldn't understand what was happening at the end of the return of the king.Oh dear![]()
Yes, Left Turn Clyde is a textbook example of a modern, ADD kid obsessed with superficiality and fast cuts.![]()
no, just someone who couldn't understand what was happening at the end of the return of the king.
wasn't complicated at all.
no, just someone who couldn't understand what was happening at the end of the return of the king.
wasn't complicated at all.
tom bombadil can fuck off, quite frankly
great movies. this generation's starwars.
Horrible horrible boring bloated toss.
no, just someone who couldn't understand what was happening at the end of the return of the king.
wasn't complicated at all.
served as a metaphor for the times he experienced.
It fall between this. We can love it because it's so very true to the book (yeah, yeah, but if you wanted three films per book then you should have said, They done the best in a short timeframe).
Horrible bloated toss is an arguement that can be levelled at the books as much as the films, but it is a view that has essentially missed the charm of the story. It's a book/film that rests on a bedrock of mythology, written by a man who knew the roots of english mythology and created myth that drew in the early elements and served as a metaphor for the times he experienced.
The detractors are those whon would piss in Santas glass of sherry, those who lie awake for the tooth fairy with a rock in thier hand. People who hear about the easter bunny and start thinking about how much stew you could do with a man-sized rabbit.


I don't think he intended it that way. He quite specifically said it wasn't iirc
You're a bit old for all that make-believe stuff about Elves now though DC![]()

tbh theres more than just elves\dwarfs etc in LOTR. there are hints and insights into various other real mythologies.
yeah its a bit up itself but the attention to detail and the "history" and background is what makes it attractive to me. I did grow up with it and have lost count of how many times I have read LOTR and the other books. Tolkeins claims that the events happeing in the world had no infulence on his writings to me sound silly. there are easy comparisons to be seen - if its co-incidnece then its a big one. .I am a huge fan of historical fiction and the world that tolkein created is deep enough to allow geeks like me to read more than just the surface story.
I enjoyed the films. it was hard supressing the geek in me that wanted to pick at all the bits that differed from the books but I watched them as, I think, they were meant to be watched and have watched them a few times. yeah I would ahve liked to see Bombadil and the scouring of the shire and all the other bits but unless they fitted those aircushion things in the cinemas it would never happen. peoples arses would have died and the national debt due to having to buy cinema food would have increased to south american levels.
eh?Earlier on you were saying it was 'in depth', now you're saying it's not complicated - make your mind up.
I understood what was going on perfectly well.
eh?
You are confused because I found the conclusion of the film both of those things?

It comes down to something really simple. If you can unhinge your head long enough to be entertained by 'epic' storytelling then you like these films, if not they're overblown toss in the same way the The Iliad and most of Greek mythology and classical writing is overblown, characterless toss.
It comes down to something really simple. If you can unhinge your head long enough to be entertained by 'epic' storytelling then you like these films, if not they're overblown toss in the same way the The Iliad and most of Greek mythology and classical writing is overblown, characterless toss.
I think they're great -well shot, the CGI is great (I have enough of a life not to spend it freezeframing scenes to note that '3rd wargrider doesn't bounce correctly with warg' and all that kind of bollocks; there's some decent acting in it and some really awful stuff; the ending of the last film is hysterically funny, altho it's telling that what's now seen as being 'homoerotic' was, by the standards of the time JRR was writing, the way close male friends would talk to each other which in a way is a little bit sad and posisbly a measure of how most male bonding behaviours are now considered 'homoerotic', but I digress...
