Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

What you think

  • It grate the CGI rocks

    Votes: 24 77.4%
  • To long to boaring

    Votes: 5 16.1%
  • GO see Ban Manners insted

    Votes: 2 6.5%

  • Total voters
    31
actually bill baily would make a good bombadil

Much better than Blessed. I like Brian Blessed but he lacks subtlety and Bombadil is an ethereal, otherworldly character (unlike humans, hobbits or dwarves for example) who requires something other than a big booming voice
 
nah, i was star trek all the way when i was younger... but you're right, i was just saying it to be faux controversial

the other brother got to you first with that :(

at least I got to steer you towards the correct football team, which is more important :D

strung_out is too young to have played star wars with me tbh
 
You know what he means, and he's entirely right.
The film doesn't end five times. I have no idea what nonsense he's spouting. Perhaps develop a better attention span and not moan because the story is a bit more in depth than the MTV generation give it credit for.
 
The film doesn't end five times. I have no idea what nonsense he's spouting. Perhaps develop a better attention span and not moan because the story is a bit more in depth than the MTV generation give it credit for.

Oh dear :D :D

Yes, Left Turn Clyde is a textbook example of a modern, ADD kid obsessed with superficiality and fast cuts. :)
 
The film doesn't end five times. I have no idea what nonsense he's spouting. Perhaps develop a better attention span and not moan because the story is a bit more in depth than the MTV generation give it credit for.

It was a slight exaggeration - when I saw it at the cinema, we kept thinking it had finished and started making moves to leave, only for it to carry on a bit longer. The last time it happened there was an audible groan from the audience. It was such a nauseatingly sentimental overextended ending. There's not really much depth to the story, so you obviously have no idea what you are talking about
 
I try really hard to watch the films, and struggle. I prefer the books to the films I think, but that's often the case with me.

I felt that in the films there were too many omissions, too many bits glossed over, I thought it made it harder to follow and my ex (who hasn't read the books) found it even harder, so much so that I ended up explaining everything to him throughout the film which just re-inforced the whole 'the book makes more sense' feeling that I have about it.

That said, there are enough people who think the films are fabulous for me to say that people should watch them and make up their own minds. :D
 
So instead you visit a thread about it. :rolleyes:
Of course; this being a forum where we discuss our opinions on books, films, TV, radio & writing. So, unless the posting rules say "btw, only post on threads about films you like", I'll continue to give my opinions whether favourable or not.

:)
 
It was a slight exaggeration - when I saw it at the cinema, we kept thinking it had finished and started making moves to leave, only for it to carry on a bit longer. The last time it happened there was an audible groan from the audience. It was such a nauseatingly sentimental overextended ending. There's not really much depth to the story, so you obviously have no idea what you are talking about

To be fair, that's also quite reflective of the book. At least there's not all that stuff about rescuing the Shire in the film.
 
Of course; this being a forum where we discuss our opinions on books, films, TV, radio & writing. So, unless the posting rules say "btw, only post on threads about films you like", I'll continue to give my opinions whether favourable or not.

:)

I think you protest too much.

I think, perhaps, you had a lonley, unhappy childhood where you sort escape through fantasy role playing games, painting LOTR figerines and learning elvish. I bet you even read the Silmarillion - and enjoyed it!

But since then you have tried to supress your true self - give in danny - follow your secret desites - don your pointy hat, grab your staff and meet up with the local hobbit botherers to watch all three films back to back.
 
:D

I'm a repressed, closet elf?
Yes, give in to it, danny
elfworship.jpg
 
I think you protest too much.

I think, perhaps, you had a lonley, unhappy childhood where you sort escape through fantasy role playing games, painting LOTR figerines and learning elvish. I bet you even read the Silmarillion - and enjoyed it!

But since then you have tried to supress your true self - give in danny - follow your secret desites - don your pointy hat, grab your staff and meet up with the local hobbit botherers to watch all three films back to back.
Bugger! That's me screwed...
 
The film doesn't end five times. I have no idea what nonsense he's spouting. Perhaps develop a better attention span and not moan because the story is a bit more in depth than the MTV generation give it credit for.

I like the books and the films and I know exactly what he's talking about.
 
It doesn't have 5 endings. It has 1 ending: the bit where the film ends.

Thing is, I adore the films, but even I think the ending of the final film is the weakest point. In the book, it's important, as you have the Scouring. Without the Scouring, the ending feels a bit pointless.

In the film, they should have just ended it when Strider says "My friends, you bow to noone", which was a great moment.
 
Thing is, I adore the films, but even I think the ending of the final film is the weakest point. In the book, it's important, as you have the Scouring. Without the Scouring, the ending feels a bit pointless.

In the film, they should have just ended it when Strider says "My friends, you bow to noone", which was a great moment.

Hmmm, I dunno, I think Frodo leaving with the elves is a much more important component of the ending than the Scouring, and I can see why that stayed in the film and the Scouring didn't. Admittedly the amount of crying hobbits does get a bit much.

Personally I really struggled with the Scouring in the book version of Return of the King - that to me felt like a false ending tacked on.
 
Really? Personally I prefer the films to the book, but I love the scouring - it's all about how war affects everywhere. It's a bit odd how they come back to hobbiton in the film and everything's completely normal.
 
Back
Top Bottom