newbie
undisambiguated
Yeah, maybe not that bit.
newbie you seem to have missed the subtle point in littlebabyjesus's posting - not that the nationalised industries WERE a shambles (undeniable) but that all nationalised industries must always be a shambles and incapable of innovation (bollocks).
I'm cynical about the latter point, but open to persuasion. going out now, though, sorry.

- 84-85 was the miner's strike. By then Kinnock was the replacement for Foot. Kinnock started the move that led to 'New Labour' - the move to 'modernise' those 'stale' old socialist policies. Part of that was to attack the left wing in labour. No it was not about attacking one tiny group - it was to attack them as the organised left as a prelude to attacking the entire left of the party (including the council left reformists - those that did not run to the right at a rate of knots), as the Militants pointed out at the time. By the end of the 80s that tiny groups editorial board was expelled - and it was a test of the rest of the left. There was also the attacks on Liverpool city council at the end of the 80s (led by that 'tiny' group - who were clearly becoming a pain in Kinnocks side). The left reformists hoped that by standing aside they would not be next in the firing line (with a few honourable exceptions). That didn't work.