His (their?) breakdowns are good its just a shame they wrap them in shit.He’s not a fanboy. He’s just a film reviewer, and a really good one. His objections to the film are not based around the usual fanboy guff. His dissection is around the structure and tone of the screenplay itself. A farce is when the protagonists do things that are idiotic for no good reason, like when Chevy Chase decides to buy a shit car in the face of it being obvious to the viewer that the car is shit in Family Vacation. In Last Jedi, equivalent idiotic things happen regularly, like Finn and Rose deciding to park on the beach on a world where it is obvious they will face consequences for this, even though they are supposed to be on a covert mission. It’s not like that decision doesn’t matter either, it is fundamental to the plot, just like the poor car purchase is in Family Vacation
If you’re going to break narrative convention, know why you’re doing it. If you’re going to borrow the structure and characterisation of farce, know why you’re doing it. Some of the best films break the rules. And so do find if the worst.One of the least edifying aspects of online discourse on cinema is the undue weight given to rules and structure, as if by adhering to (or breaking) certain rules films are thereby good (or bad) - objectively so.
Luke examining his lightsaber and rejecting it would be dramatic. Luke tossing the lightsaber over his shoulder was a comedy scene. At a moment where comedy was really out of place.His (their?) breakdowns are good its just a shame they wrap them in shit.
The comedy really was the first and biggest failing of the film. The opening scene with the prank phone call and the 'your mum' joke was just awful. A spot on comment I heard was that it felt like something from a comedy sketch show doing a Star Wars bit, rather than something from an actual Star Wars film.
For me, with popular/Hollywood film the conventions are so robotically obeyed that I welcome anything different, if it works in the overall context of that particular film. I'd rather see a flawed attempt to do something different than that same one structure flogged to death and beyond.If you’re going to break narrative convention, know why you’re doing it. If you’re going to borrow the structure and characterisation of farce, know why you’re doing it. Some of the best films break the rules. And so do find if the worst.
But Luke walking out to face Kylo!The Plinkett review pointed out that Last Jedi would have been orders of magnitude better had it ended at the point Kylo was reaching out to Rey just after they’d beaten Snoke. Leave it on a cliffhanger in which both those characters could go either way. Everything that happened after that point was either trite, stupid or trite and stupid. Plus the film was too long anyway.
Your mum is the eternally implacable enemy of fillum and space.I have always hated every single thing about Star Wars and always will. The "franchise" is the eternally implacable enemy of fillum and space.
Everyone needs a reason to get up in the morning.Your mum is the eternally implacable enemy of fillum and space.
Comedy is one thing but farce is something else. Kylo’s face off with Luke was not the time for a comedy beat and his ludicrous reaction was farcical in its incompetenceAs farcical as Han chasing Stormtroopers down a Death Star corridor? Or Ewoks fighting space Nazis in walking tanks? Or a big space worm swallowing the Millennium falcon?
At a very fundamental level, Star Wars is a comedy, a pastiche. Otherwise it's a terrible story about billions of people dying in a war.
Thanks but I've really got better things to do today. I'm already suspicious of someone who takes this much time nitpicking a movie to death. I see more value in spending time a (video) essay which makes you appreciate a film more, rather than one that is fanning the flames of hate for an hour....
