I was wondering that myself.
If you don't know then you're part of the problem.
I was wondering that myself.
As for conditions, the rise of mass factory production gave rise to a paradigm worker subjectivity which was relatively homogeneous
Am I an anarcho-leninoid letty? Perhaps people do not recognise themselves as 'utopian anarchists'? So they do not answer your question... I skim read as I said before and if I don't think there's anything to be gained I do not answer. In this case it has interested me enough to have a go so i will.
I think there are a lot of political problems which are expediently dealt with by some eg. Apart from virtually the entire left, in the AF/Sol Fed or where ever, though there are lots more people than you may imagine who are 'thinking independents', which is the biggest grouping on the left incidentally - not the SWP![]()
As for conditions, the rise of mass factory production gave rise to a paradigm worker subjectivity which was relatively homogeneous, and relatively easy to organise. Before that, in similar conditions to today, our foremothers and fathers struggled long and hard to keep the flame going. It is not too much to ask for us to do the same. As it goes, I am optomistic about the potential for working class political growth, and so 'why do I keep going' does not enter my head as the class struggle itself is interesting enough.
You can't answer the question then (nor can, it seems, any of the others anarcholeninists)? Fair enough.
Let me get this right: If I don't know why someone has formulated a quite ridiculous conflation of two "isms" I'm "part of the problem"?If you don't know then you're part of the problem.
why the IWCA think secrecy is appropriate. Why don't they publish the names of their national officers and NCC, why don't they publish agendas and reports of their annual conference.
What's an anarcholeninist?!


As usual, so vague as to say virtually nothing.
Posted by Attica
No Letty - you are mistaken here, you just do not know what I am talking about. You do not know why the Leninist model worked then! 'Paradigm worker subjectivity' refers to the specific class position (or class composition and/or role in the labour process) of people. It is by keying into this that political progress may occur, Lenin managed to do so, and other thinking Marxists such as Negri try to as well.
Let me get this right: If I don't know why someone has formulated a quite ridiculous conflation of two "isms" I'm "part of the problem"?
To be frank, I don't believe it's me that has the problem here, but rather the person doing the labeling.
And as you've debated the far left on this question loads of times before and know what everyone is gonna say and what you're gonna say back, I'd ask again, why do you care or bother?
Fibber.Thanks for clearing that up-I spoiled my weekend worrying about it.
Shall we try to do something about it though?I love it. You love it.