Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The handmaid's' tale

Again, don't see why I need to just to please you. I said it was clearly a critique, so if you can't/won't understand that, I can't help you.
I understand what you said, I don't understand why you said it and so would appreciate clarification on that why point. Of course you don't need to if you don't want to. Seems to me it's a critique of mad xians so valid under Reagan, Bush Jr, Trump... Hard to see how something announced in April last year could be so presciently written as to critique something not then existing. No biggie, just curious.
 
where is everyone in gilead? when they walk the streets there are plenty of security guys about, handmaids, wives and marthas but literally no one else.

What happened to all the non fertile women and men that aren't commanders? where is the general public? Was there a huge purge? Did that many people escape to mexico and canada? I'd like to see more of the coup.

Given that the population seems to be so low why are there armed security men everywhere? they don't seem to be in a guerilla war situation, there seems to be no resistance other than the group helping smuggle handmaids out.
 
where is everyone in gilead? when they walk the streets there are plenty of security guys about, handmaids, wives and marthas but literally no one else.

What happened to all the non fertile women and men that aren't commanders? where is the general public? Was there a huge purge? Did that many people escape to mexico and canada? I'd like to see more of the coup.

Given that the population seems to be so low why are there armed security men everywhere? they don't seem to be in a guerilla war situation, there seems to be no resistance other than the group helping smuggle handmaids out.
My reasoning is that they must be marthas in women only factories or whatever. Guarded over by men in black with big guns.

I don't think it's been explained, though.
 
most people will have fled, got out before they froze the womens bank accnts and all that. there arefields to be worked, factories and the colonies. As for the militarization of public life I assumed that was due to the form their xtian fascist state had taken, they go that way don't they, fash states? especially when at war
 
What I find most questionable in terms of the internal logic, is that the men, empowered by the gileadean morality, and by access to guns, are ok with the whole "only commanders can have wives/sex" aspect of things.
Men who transgress sex rules get beaten to death by the handmaids
 
Men who transgress sex rules get beaten to death by the handmaids
Well yes. That would happen now. But the transition from USA to Gilead happened in stages. We've the number of commanders is tiny compared to the number of armed men. At what point did they say to those men, "oh, btw you're never having sex again. But we are. And we're going to forcibly remove your wives and girlfriends, some of whom we will pass between ourselves to repeatedly rape and father children by." Because the men with guns would have had to agree to that. Instead of shooting the comparatively small number of commanders.
 
iirc from the book they were forbiden to wank either, sin of onan. So yeah, how long could you put up with that? I can only assume the armed men serving Gilead are the fanatics, true believers. Possibly some sort of horrific underground semi-sanctioned brothel situation...
 
I suppose once your population has dropped to that extent you'd need to run the place like a prison to prevent anyone else from leaving. I'd been expecting some sort of ressistance/terrorist attacks to be going on even if only in the background but so far all seems quiet.

I thought the guards were free to marry non fertile women just like the commanders but they're not deemed repectable or pious enough to be assigned a handmaid to breed with.

Gilead can't last long in it's war, their population seems tiny and they need half their troops to secure their own country.
 
where is everyone in gilead? when they walk the streets there are plenty of security guys about, handmaids, wives and marthas but literally no one else.

What happened to all the non fertile women and men that aren't commanders? where is the general public? Was there a huge purge? Did that many people escape to mexico and canada? I'd like to see more of the coup.

Given that the population seems to be so low why are there armed security men everywhere? they don't seem to be in a guerilla war situation, there seems to be no resistance other than the group helping smuggle handmaids out.
I'm a little further into the series and while not giving anything away will say the questions grow.

It caused me to think; these dystopian worlds seem to work better if you stay narrow like, perhaps, The Road. The further you broaden from the central theme/characters, the more conceits you ask the public to accept. It's a shame if the implausibilities mount to the extent they distract.
 
I'm a little further into the series and while not giving anything away will say the questions grow.

It caused me to think; these dystopian worlds seem to work better if you stay narrow like, perhaps, The Road. The further you broaden from the central theme/characters, the more conceits you ask the public to accept. It's a shame if the implausibilities mount to the extent they distract.

Yep, the thing with dystopian stuff is that it's the descent that's as interesting as the narrative itself. Every one has an implied prequel, i'm hoping they flesh it out in flashbacks.
 
What I find most questionable in terms of the internal logic, is that the men, empowered by the gileadean morality, and by access to guns, are ok with the whole "only commanders can have wives/sex" aspect of things.

Was thinking about this, then i remembered places like jonestown. people are weird.
 
What I find most questionable in terms of the internal logic, is that the men, empowered by the gileadean morality, and by access to guns, are ok with the whole "only commanders can have wives/sex" aspect of things.

My vague memories from the book are that the middle ranking men have wives, just no access to Handmaids maybe. Only on episode 3 of the TV series though.
 
My vague memories from the book are that the middle ranking men have wives, just no access to Handmaids maybe. Only on episode 3 of the TV series though.
Some time since I read the book, but yes. The wives of "poor men" wore a different colour cloak from the Handmaids
 
I've seen the end of the series now. I guess on balance I'm glad I stuck with it - uplifting in the end - although it got very sticky around e7 and e8.

Kind of interesting that this drama is being shown as, if we believe the media, the end for Raqqa draws near. There will be stories that make Sinjar pale.
 
im really impressed with this. brilliantly acted and shot, gripping, unbearably tense and totally nails the fear and invasive horror of a totalitarian state. It also pulls no punches with its politics - this is the end point of oppressive patriarchy, this is how the different pieces of religion, sex shaming, disempowerment, the reduction of women to property, the denial of control of their own bodies, the protection of male privilege and hierarchy fit together into an all encompassing misogynistic tyranny.
 
Back
Top Bottom