ruffneck23
front left
Grandma Death said:And whats a stephen king adaptation supposed to feel like then?![]()
apart from perhaps carrie , CRAP
stop looking for trouble GD

Grandma Death said:And whats a stephen king adaptation supposed to feel like then?![]()

ruffneck23 said:apart from perhaps carrie , CRAP
stop looking for trouble GD![]()

mattkidd12 said:its boring, too slow, anti-climax ending...just completely overrated.
Grandma Death said:Narr the majority of the film adaptations are shite but we cannot ignore the good ones:
Dead Zone
Shawshank Redemption
Stand By Me
Green Mile
Salems Lot and even IT isnt that bad.
Sides which I dont look for trouble-trouble finds me![]()

Both sentimental tripeRenegadeDog said:Good film, but not as good as the Shawshank Redemption...
radiohead said:there was a fucking execution![]()
thats what i thought ( the racist issues = bollox ) cos if there really was a feeling of racism , why wasnt there a public out cry when it was released???kyser_soze said:The black character is there as a representative JC character - he's been wrongly imprisoned despite having a healing power...I think the accusations of racism against this are utter bollocks.

PacificOcean said:And that made it an 18? Are they worried kids are going to copy killing each other in electric chairs?
And anyway I saw an episode of the Simpsons on at 7pm Sky One which had Mayor Quimby being electrocuted in an electric chair and much, much worse violence in the 15 rated Doom.
kyser_soze said:So lemme get this straight - because he's black and a 'simpleton' it's racist,
kyser_soze said:However, as far as Neva's comments go about there being no intelligent advertising executives, I would ask have you actually worked in advertising? I worked in it for over a decade and met less ignorant and stupid people than I have in any other job I've worked in - the main crime for most was being intelligent with a fairly narrow frame of reference rather than actually being stupid.
And that joke about writing a novel is as old as the hills.
CharlieAddict said:great film but does anyone know what the book was like?
Orang Utan said:The book was a serial in its original format, wasn't it?
kyser_soze said:Ah, so if this character is played by a white person in a black film, would that be racist? Would it be racist if this character was played by ANY non-white person?
Load of bollocks - the character described above, minus the 'black' is a character found in millenia of storytelling found in literature all over the world - whomever wrote this needs to look at the history of storytelling and characterisation since it's been around. The fact is if Coffey was a white guy he'd still be a character that is there as a plot device for Tom Hanks prison warden, and then, naturally, it wouldn't be racist...
No. He was executed because he was found holding the dead bodies of two little girls who had been raped and murdered. As it happens he was trying to bring them back to life, but he did not have the capacity to explain - all he said was that he had "tried to take it back" (his words for healing people, taken by others to mean that he had hurt them in the first place, which he hadn't).PacificOcean said:Maybe I missed the point of the film, but wasn't the point of the story that if he wasn't black he wouldn't have been executed?
ymu said:No. He was executed because he was found holding the dead bodies of two little girls who had been raped and murdered. As it happens he was trying to bring them back to life, but he did not have the capacity to explain - all he said was that he had "tried to take it back" (his words for healing people, taken by others to mean that he had hurt them in the first place, which he hadn't).
All the other inmates of the "Green Mile" (Death Row) are white. There are three executions in the film (and another extrajudicial one). The film is anti-death penalty, but it's not making any points about disproportionate use of the death penalty for black convicts. There is a brief scene suggesting that his lawyer did not try too hard and did not see him fully as a human being - he drew a comparison to a dog that turns nasty, which would fit with attitudes in the 1930's (as well as JC being a "simpleton") - but there was overwhelming circumstantial evidence for a particularly horrible crime and a suspect who wasn't trying to defend himself, so it was hardly a biting commentary on racial attitudes.