Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Genuine Urban Election Poll

Cast your votes here!


  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .
You see, it's impossible to say why any one of these contributors is 'better' than another - I would need at least another two polls to continue listing the contributors to P&P - each contributor provides an essential viewpoint which goes to making up 'the bigger picture', and yet no one viewpoint is essentially 'more correct' than another viewpoint, although some posters do manage to encompass, in a nutshell, the crux of the matter, other posters highlight the breadth or depth of the situation being discussed! (n.b. trolls, flamers, and stalkers are excluded from this general praise)

These polls are essentially pointless, so feel free to ignore them :D
 
Guineveretoo said:
What's with all the "elections" in these forums??

:confused:

There's a long-running, often banned, self-styled clique (who hang out elsewhere) that like to run popularity contests and employ a stalk/flame/gang style of mentality when discussing politics in these forums - they began the 'election/contest', where the 'I'm more right than you are and my mates say so too' style of discussion either trashes the discussion, or renders the discussion impossible for everyone else to join in with, which reduces the thoughts/opinions offered, and puts off some from expressing an opinion and contributing to a wider discussion that might include new details that others might not have known about.
 
I haven't seen him post on here for a while. He certainly doesn't post on here as regularly as he used to.

Why haven't you nominated durruti!?!
 
tangentlama said:
There's a long-running, often banned, self-styled clique (who hang out elsewhere) that like to run popularity contests and employ a stalk/flame/gang style of mentality when discussing politics in these forums - they began the 'election/contest', where the 'I'm more right than you are and my mates say so too' style of discussion either trashes the discussion, or renders the discussion impossible for everyone else to join in with, which reduces the thoughts/opinions offered, and puts off some from expressing an opinion and contributing to a wider discussion that might include new details that others might not have known about.


So you've started two polls on top of the two existing polls because there was a group of people who by and large left here nearly two years ago? What an odd thing to do.

And what's more, you're wrong about them starting lots of polls like this or the other one - there was a poster/trot/anarchist of the year type thing at the end of most years that ran for a few days and that everyone knew was holiday-pissing about type stuff.
 
torres said:
So you've started two polls on top of the two existing polls because there was a group of people who by and large left here nearly two years ago? What an odd thing to do.

And what's more, you're wrong about them starting lots of polls like this or the other one - there was a poster/trot/anarchist of the year type thing at the end of most years that ran for a few days and that everyone knew was holiday-pissing about type stuff.

I refer you to post number 5

You claimed things wrongly - you claim a I gave a reason (that you just made up yourself) and then you state a thing that I never said (you claimed I said 'they' started lots of polls which I didn't!), and then you said I was wrong about things that you said I said, when in fact, you said them.
 
tangentlama said:
I refer you to post number 5

You claimed things wrongly - you claim a I gave a reason (that you just made up yourself) and then you state a thing that I never said (you claimed I said 'they' started lots of polls which I didn't!), and then you said I was wrong about things that you said I said, when in fact, you said them.

Hang on, you replied to the direct question "What's with all the "elections" in these forums??" with

There's a long-running, often banned, self-styled clique (who hang out elsewhere) that like to run popularity contests and employ a stalk/flame/gang style of mentality when discussing politics in these forums - they began the 'election/contest', where the 'I'm more right than you are and my mates say so too' style of discussion either trashes the discussion, or renders the discussion impossible for everyone else to join in with, which reduces the thoughts/opinions offered, and puts off some from expressing an opinion and contributing to a wider discussion that might include new details that others might not have known about.

can't you see that this might be taken as outlining some reasons for your own outbreak of poll starting today? Especially when the fact is that these sort of polls have been noticable by their absence over the last two years.

In that sense you're explaining something that doesn't exist really, and so it's not suprising that some people imagine that you're referring to, as i said above, your own polls started today. Fine, if you were trying to explain the why the forum has so many polls - it just doesn't IMO.
 
If that happens there will be another Kronstadt on your hands. This time the winners will be the petit-bourgeois pro-Whites though.
 
I voted for you, mk12, even though I don't post much in here, I do read it and you're one of the few people I tend to nod at.

However as a person... ;)
 
JoePolitix said:
MC5 for people's commissar for Urban 75!

He'll root out the filth.

Armed and ready. :D
barry.jpg
 
torres said:
So you've started two polls on top of the two existing polls because there was a group of people who by and large left here nearly two years ago? What an odd thing to do.

And what's more, you're wrong about them starting lots of polls like this or the other one - there was a poster/trot/anarchist of the year type thing at the end of most years that ran for a few days and that everyone knew was holiday-pissing about type stuff.

You're a member of the clique that tangentlama is talking about...or did you think you were genuinely independent?

You take the piss, you really do. Anyone would think that you had a genuine grievance but it's more hot air - as usual. :D
 
You're just pissed off because your name wasn't included. I wonder why? Is it because you have nothing to offer but snide remarks? Probably.
 
Back
Top Bottom