Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Future of Christianity?

For once I find myself agreeing with what you have to say Phil. Although I must say that much of it is assumption albeit inteligently so.

If organised religion and rational empiricism have both had their day. What is the third way?

The pragmatism of the enlightenment and the mysticism of religion are both still prevelant forces in society.

It is my feeling, and if you like assumption. (Seeing as this thread was started with a few. ;) :D ) That these two influences combined lead society towards a sort of pragmatic mysticism seen in much new age thought.

What is practical spiritually then?

In the end we just want to feel good. It could be argued that any personal belief that enpowers us to reach more of that feeling and greater personal freedom is eminently practical.

It may be that society, having realised on some level that religion was disempowering each of us. Reached into a spiritual void and latched onto a form of empirical materialism which inevitably left a hole for some.

The new synthesis is in my opinion personal spirituality. By which I mean whatever belief it is that empowers us individually.

This seems to me to be a positive step. After all we can only give to each other what we have already attained for ourselves
 
Has Christianity really declined significantly? Or is it just that those who do not believe can now say so without it being socially unacceptable (or illegal)?
 
paganism already pwns the lot of you, and you don't even know it
paglia_200.jpg
 
I think Christianity will adopt Islamic ideas about a faceless God, and leave Jesus to rest in peace, OK as an icon to project onto but nothing else. Ideas of virgin births,resurrection will no longer matter.

Of course this causes deep division, but a new Islamo/Christian/Pagan hybrid will emerge from the people who can break with their pasts, possibly led by physicists and Hawkins as their leader.
 
RubberBuccaneer said:
I think Christianity will adopt Islamic ideas about a faceless God, and leave Jesus to rest in peace, OK as an icon to project onto but nothing else. Ideas of virgin births,resurrection will no longer matter.

In other words, all Christians will convert to Islam? I think so too.
 
I think it'll be pure Islam without any cultural references ( after all as a Welshman , I don't follow middle Eastern religions ), and would be called something else, so as to be inclusive ( you could say all the cores of major religions point to this, even Christainity, as the Jesus saviour figure was an invention by the early church founders not Christ himself ).

Physicists would also convert, realise or discover, as God is there you don't invent God you discover God.
There is no need for any organised priesthood or ceremonies as everyone has a direct link to God.
Likewise there is no need to pray, this God is non interventionalist, It'll do you no good. 'Inshallah' or 'Gods will' is just another way of saying 'That's life' or 'shit happens'. What else do you expect?, you are responsible for your own actions.
In short , God is there, neither helping or hindering.

In fact it would be a great religion for atheists.
 
phildwyer said:
I am sorry Gurrier, but there is no place for you on this thread. You have come here only to cause trouble, as everyone knows from bitter experience. Rather than allow you the opportunity to sow yet more discord, I pre-emptively expel you from my thread. You must leave immediately.

No, he's right. That's exactly how the thread's going to go.
 
RubberBuccaneer said:
I think it'll be pure Islam without any cultural references ( after all as a Welshman , I don't follow middle Eastern religions ), and would be called something else, so as to be inclusive ( you could say all the cores of major religions point to this, even Christainity, as the Jesus saviour figure was an invention by the early church founders not Christ himself ).

Physicists would also convert, realise or discover, as God is there you don't invent God you discover God.
There is no need for any organised priesthood or ceremonies as everyone has a direct link to God.
Likewise there is no need to pray, this God is non interventionalist, It'll do you no good. 'Inshallah' or 'Gods will' is just another way of saying 'That's life' or 'shit happens'. What else do you expect?, you are responsible for your own actions.
In short , God is there, neither helping or hindering.

In fact it would be a great religion for atheists.
The Church of God Who Makes No Difference, maybe? I don't think it's reassuring enough to catch on in any big way.
 
Crispy said:
No, he's right. That's exactly how the thread's going to go.
Phil's denunciation would have looked a lot better written in green ink and if it'd quoted from various texts on excorsim if you ask me.

But no one did :(
 
RubberBuccaneer said:
I think it'll be pure Islam without any cultural references ( after all as a Welshman , I don't follow middle Eastern religions ), and would be called something else, so as to be inclusive ( you could say all the cores of major religions point to this, even Christainity, as the Jesus saviour figure was an invention by the early church founders not Christ himself ).

Well that's certainly what Muslims say. As Christianity does to Judaism, Islam claims to have superseeded and incorporated Christianity. Christians point out that Jews are silly to believe that God would reveal Himself to just one people, while Muslims point out that Christians are silly to believe that Yeshua of Nazareth was God incarnate. Trouble is, I reckon Mulsims are silly to believe that Mohammed was the *last* prophet. How can there be a last prophet? I reckon prophecy is a continuous revelation, it can't ever stop.
 
phildwyer said:
You say that I am. Anyone want to take a bet on how long it will take Nino to get the allusion?

There's evidence of your half-baked notions all over this forum, phil. Are you trying to tell me that the evidence is wrong? It rather speaks for itself.

It's no good trying to get the audience on your side, you lost them ages ago. :p
 
phildwyer said:
You say that I am. (I reckon it'll take him a couple of days at least).

Are you still here, phil? Anyone would think you've nothing better to do with yourself.

It's a little cold under that bridge today - isn't it? :D
 
phildwyer said:
You say that I am. (Mind you, no-one ever lost money by over-estimating the density of Nino Savatte. I say three days).

You do realise that repetition is a sign of a serious mental illness, don't you?

Of course not - you think your shit doesn't stink.
 
phildwyer said:
You say that I do. (I'm starting to feel a bit mean now).

Oh, I'm soo scared, phil. What are you going to do, hit me with your soiled nappy? :D

You're still repeating yourself btw. What next? Echolalia?
 
nino_savatte said:
What are you going to do, hit me with your soiled nappy?

You say that I am. (Anyone want to put Nino out of his misery here? *I'm* certainly not going to do it).
 
Back
Top Bottom