Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The film is better than the book...

Any film based on the Bible is almost certainly going to be better than the book, imo
King James version has some great lines though, even if overall it's a bit of a mess that could do with an severe edit. Consider ye the lilies of the field... and all that.
 
Cuckoo's Nest is not better than the book, but I think it's the best adaptation that coulda been hoped for given that the source material was very complicated to turn in to a film.

It's my favourite book, and one of my favourite films, and I see them as equals really.
The film manages to remove, or at least reduce, a lot of the books sexism. Not entirely, by any means, but it does at least make an effort.
 
Any film based on the Bible is almost certainly going to be better than the book, imo
There's loads of terrible bible films, while the book has one of the most memorable bad-arse super-villains ever in the first half. He destroys whole cities, turns people to salt, feeds people to whales and in one particularly brutal episode drowns everybody in the world except 8 survivors. All with no comeuppance. Sure the book sags badly in places, especially the second half, but it's also got one of the most fucking weird final chapters in literature.
 
There's loads of terrible bible films, while the book has one of the most memorable bad-arse super-villains ever in the first half. He destroys whole cities, turns people to salt, feeds people to whales and in one particularly brutal episode drowns everybody in the world except 8 survivors. All with no comeuppance. Sure the book sags badly in places, especially the second half, but it's also got one of the most fucking weird final chapters in literature.
Not to mention inspiring some of the worst and the best fanfiction ever written.
 
Once Upon a Time in America (although I think the book was written after the film)

Haven't read the book but it's called The Hoods by Harry Grey and published 30 years before the Leone epic. Books written after the films are usually shite, imho. Mind you, Neil Gaiman's Neverwhere (the novel) is far better than the telly show.
 
Papillon

It may be because the book is a translation that it reads so turgidly, or because that accurately reflects the literary style of 'Papillon':

" At the last moment I decided to chain my left wrist to the rope binding the sacks. All at once I was afraid of losing my hold and being swept away without them. Sylvain got up on to the opposite rock, helped by Chang. The moon was high now and we could see very well.
I had rolled a towel round my head. There were six waves to be waited for. Only a few minutes left now. Chang had come back to my side. He hugged me round the neck and then kissed me. He was going to lie there wedged in an angle of the rock and grip my legs to help me withstand the shock of Lisette’s breaking.

Whatever. The film is better.
 
Back
Top Bottom