The revolutionary left doubles down. Some of it no problem, some of it true, but it’s not likely to help Labour get out of a hole. Sure you don’t give up on people, but can Labour afford Beeley sympathisers who don’t know when to give it a rest?
Chris Williamson’s suspension must be opposed
This made me laugh - although perhaps I should take more seriously the dangers of running dogs in the AWL
Defend Corbyn against the AWL
Listening to and reading the views of a whole range of former comrades and colleagues across various campaigns and movements these days is like being in the last few scenes of Invasion of the Bodysnatchers. The blinkered adherence to a narrative, the conspiraloonery, the defence of self serving idiots and demagogues on partisan grounds, the rank tribalism, the lack of any critical thought or nuance is shocking. How the hell did we get here?Parking these here for future reference.
Listening to and reading the views of a whole range of former comrades and colleagues across various campaigns and movements these days is like being in the last few scenes of Invasion of the Bodysnatchers. The blinkered adherence to a narrative, the conspiraloonery, the defence of self serving idiots and demagogues on partisan grounds, the rank tribalism, the lack of any critical thought or nuance is shocking. How the hell did we get here?
If indeed there is a ‘disturbingly antisemitic culture’ in the UK, why would coverage of that culture be something that the BBC would need to ‘spring on us’? The ‘disturbingly antisemtic culture’ that Graeber refers to is scandalous by its nature, isn’t it? The BBC would be right to cover this, surely? And why the BBC be the ones to ‘spring [an antisemitism scandal] on us’?Good fucking riddance.This horrendous prick is mates with loads of the anti-fracking crowd.
The Website of Ian R Crane
Ian R Crane (@IanRCrane) on Twitter
I'd suggest you put on sunglasses before you have a look at his website.

It’s certainly grammatically painful.obviously the use of the word ‘gagged’ is very poorly advised here.
It’s certainly grammatically painful.
Black lives matter uk I supposewho are ‘BLM UK’?
Who he?Good news everyone! Ian Crane is dead![]()
Who he?
Just look a few posts up this threadWho he?
Who he?
That article looks like a hit piece to me. I'd check out the primary source and listen properly to everything Finkelstein actually said and the points he was making in the proper context before rushing to judgement. He was clearly arguing for free expression and against censorship, not trying to spread antisemitism or any other kind of bigotry. Noam Chomsky has made the very same case about free expression. I have to wonder why you didn't provide the primary source because important stuff that Finkelstein said in that discussion is omitted from that article. At one point he says "I don't know if Jews killed Christ or not and frankly I don't care." And he said that Irving "knew a thing or two" in reference to his book about Goebbels, which he read. Well in my view he was clumsy calling him a 'very good historian' but isn't he entitled to his own opinion that he knew a thing or two?
The "Jewish Billionaire class" eh Norm?
Finkelstein has gotten a lot of positive coverage from leftists recently as a result of his full-throated defence of the people of Gaza against brutal Israeli violence. However, when you look at this guy's broader politics, they stink. He recently defended the "moral right" of Russia to invade Ukraine, and just spouted out all the Kremlin bullshit propaganda about the Ukrainian government being illegitimate and nazis and 'its all Nato's fault"
In a meeting full of cranks he praised holocaust denier David Irving as a "very good historian" and defended the classification of jews as 'christ killers':
![]()
The failings of Finkelstein
Norman Finkelstein has always been a loose cannon. His sometimes insightful political and historical analysis is invariably undermined by…medium.com
He seems to be - or have devolved to be - your common-or-garden red-brown 'anti-imperialist' crank.
That article looks like a hit piece to me. I'd check out the primary source and listen properly to everything Finkelstein actually said and the points he was making before rushing to judgement. He was clearly arguing for free expression and against censorship, not trying to spread antisemitism or any other kind of bigotry. Noam Chomsky has made the very same case about free expression. I have to wonder why you didn't provide the primary source because important stuff that Finkelstein said in that discussion is omitted from that article. At one point he says "I don't know if Jews killed Christ or not and frankly I don't care." And he said that Irving "knew a thing or two" in reference to his book about Goebbels, which he read. Well in my view he was clumsy calling him a 'very good historian' but isn't he entitled to his own opinion that he knew a thing or two?
Using the term "jewish billionaire class" is perhaps clumsy I guess, but nothing more. I'd imagine he's referring to Zionist billionaires who are jewish. I very much doubt he believes theres a secret cabal of them pulling the strings tho. Personally, I'm much more concerned about innocent civilians being massacred by the IDF at this time aswell. And Finkelstein is clearly knowledgeable when it comes to Israel/Palestine, and provides useful information on that topic.
And I mean, are you actually claiming that a guy who lost his entire family in the holocaust is an antisemite?
As for his views regarding Ukraine and Russia, I personally think he's wrong.
This is the primary source. Finkelstein starts talking at about 1:05 and the bits mentioned begin at about 1:18. I don't think he said anything antisemitic, he simply argues against censorship.
Crush that dissentI wonder which account this sad cunt is sock puppet for?
That article looks like a hit piece to me. I'd check out the primary source and listen properly to everything Finkelstein actually said and the points he was making before rushing to judgement. He was clearly arguing for free expression and against censorship, not trying to spread antisemitism or any other kind of bigotry. Noam Chomsky has made the very same case about free expression. I have to wonder why you didn't provide the primary source because important stuff that Finkelstein said in that discussion is omitted from that article. At one point he says "I don't know if Jews killed Christ or not and frankly I don't care." And he said that Irving "knew a thing or two" in reference to his book about Goebbels, which he read. Well in my view he was clumsy calling him a 'very good historian' but isn't he entitled to his own opinion that he knew a thing or two?
Using the term "jewish billionaire class" is perhaps clumsy I guess, but nothing more. I'd imagine he's referring to Zionist billionaires who are jewish. I very much doubt he believes theres a secret cabal of them pulling the strings tho. Personally, I'm much more concerned about innocent civilians being massacred by the IDF at this time aswell. And Finkelstein is clearly knowledgeable when it comes to Israel/Palestine, and provides useful information on that topic.
And I mean, are you actually claiming that a guy who lost his entire family in the holocaust is an antisemite?
As for his views regarding Ukraine and Russia, I personally think he's wrong.
This is the primary source. Finkelstein starts talking at about 1:05 and the bits mentioned begin at about 1:18. I don't think he said anything antisemitic, he simply argues against censorship.
I can't say that I like the politics of those people, but the fact remains that the article is a hit piece and that Finkelstein didn't say anything bigoted.Proving that he's not an antiSemite by sharing a platform with Chris Williamson and David Miller who make bizarre antiSemitic broadcasts on their weekly broadcast on an Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting station. From them, I learnt that Odessa was founded in the 18th Century by nefarious Jewish settlers; and that the women beaten, shot, gaoled and executed for demonstrating for their rights in Iran over the past two years were subversive Zionist agents.
Yeah, it can't be a nice experience being caught out, but it really is pathetic that the best you can do is hurl insults instead of providing any kind of counter-argument.I wonder which account this sad cunt is sock puppet for?