Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Current Situation

I’m asking what you offer in terms of support. I see all the negativity you offer.
Where we would be with a club of people like you is in the Isthmian South.

We knew you have been coming since 2012. I assume you like it more now, which shows you didn’t get it back then and you probably never will.

I don’t despise any of those things you have named. We had all of those things in 2012 as you should know. What we have added however, is more scum like you, who apparently offer nothing except negativity and entrance money. Or am I wrong and you offer something else?

BIG I think you should start your own forum just for you then you won’t have to reply to anyone who may have different opinion. Your beginning to sound a bit like a certain owner at Romford.
 
Last edited:
Let's get back on track with this season's performances and look at some numbers.

The first 8 games we collected 14 points
The 4 game mini run in early January gave us 8 points.
That means the other 20 games have resulted in 12 points.
By any measure that is terrible.
Let's also look at our 4 seasons in the Isthmian Premier prior to promotion. We collected between 76 and 82 points, which is very consistent but ultimately shows that whatever personnel changes were made the result was the same.
 
I haven't been watching Hamlet regularly for long, so don't know all the history. However, I do remember in the preseason game the Spurs u23 gaffer was an ex Hamlet boss. I know it's different developing youngsters compared to the Men's First XI, but is it worth suggesting Gavin and Junior have a chat with Wayne Burnett?

Purely in a CPD/knowledge gaining session, most of us have to do it at work after all!
 
Last edited:
I haven't been watching Hamlet regularly for long, so don't know all the history. However, I do remember in the preseason game the Spurs u23 gaffer was an ex Hamlet boss. I know it's different developing youngsters compared to the Men's First XI, but is it worth suggesting Gavin and Junior have a chat with Wayne Burnett?

Purely in a CPD/knowledge gaining session, most of us have to do it at work after all!

If managers have mentors they are their own choice and any attempt by a board to impose one would not be well received. The current management have 10 years experience managing in men's football and the name you mention is somebody who I'm sure they know.

If they want to seek support from their own network that's fine but that will be their decision.

I think the powers that be have been very supportive this season and don't believe any other club with our budget would have tolerated what has unfolded this season.
 
I think the powers that be have been very supportive this season and don't believe any other club with our budget would have tolerated what has unfolded this season.

Which makes me wonder why we have tolerated it to the extent that we have. Some of the performances this season have been a waste of time and money for both the club and supporters.
 
Which makes me wonder why we have tolerated it to the extent that we have. Some of the performances this season have been a waste of time and money for both the club and supporters.
At the last supporters' forum a fortnight before Christmas (which was primarily to discuss the ground redevelopment situation) someone suggested we would have been better off staying part time and retaining the bulk of last season's squad. Ben Clasper's reply was something along the lines of "with hindsight I sometimes think the same thing myself".

The switch to a full time regime was first publicly floated at a forum around the end of last season. At the December forum Ben basically admitted that the transition had been rushed through during the summer without really beginning soon enough meaning, whilst we were in the market for a higher calibre of player than the previous year, once again we were too late to sign several of our preferred transfer targets. Ben also stated that dealing with professional players (and presumably their agents) regarding contract negotiations is more challenging than before.

So, reading between the lines, I'm guessing the directors may feel partly responsible for not giving the manager the best chance to make full use of the available resources. That doesn't excuse the complete failure to make any sort of improvement whatsoever on last season's performance so far, but I do believe it's a bit more nuanced than concluding that "the manager was given everything he asked for - why aren't we doing better?"

I know when Maidstone were first promoted to the National Division just a year after winning the Isthmian League they remained part-time and struggled before going full-time for the second season. They continued to struggle, were relegated after two more seasons and are now in their third season as a full-time club. I've seen comments from a few of their supporters on social media suggesting they'd be better off spending the same yearly budget and being part-time, as they'd then be competing for the best part-time players rather than the cheapest full-time professionals. I'm not sure how valid that argument might be but there are certainly going to be some very good players who just aren't willing to give up a day job to commit to playing full-time for Maidstone or ourselves. I guess there must be an overlap between what the biggest spending part-time clubs are paying and what the lowest spending full-time clubs are spending, and I'm guessing we're somewhere within that range.

For what it's worth my own feeling is that lack of continuity is a bigger factor than budget in our poor season. We always seem to do better when we keep the previous season's squad together and just strengthen two or three positions. For our best season of all we kept everyone of note except Drage and Sekajja, brought in Hayles and Acheampong which gave real strength in depth at the back, then picked up Ferguson and Allassani after the season was underway. We then kept the same squad through to the end of the season with no more comings and goings except for short-term cover.

I think we've got some good younger players in the current squad, plus Clunis, Taylor and Edwards from the Isthmian days, while Mills is superb for me, but maybe we've overloaded with senior players who've been around the block at this level and above. You need a few seasoned campaigners like that but I'm not sure we've got the balance right, maybe we'd have been better off trying to cherry pick a few hungry younger players from the league below? I've noticed this division seems to be a bit of a merry-go-round with a lot of similar players moving between similar clubs every summer. No wonder there seems to be little to choose between most sides.
 
At the last supporters' forum a fortnight before Christmas (which was primarily to discuss the ground redevelopment situation) someone suggested we would have been better off staying part time and retaining the bulk of last season's squad. Ben Clasper's reply was something along the lines of "with hindsight I sometimes think the same thing myself".

The switch to a full time regime was first publicly floated at a forum around the end of last season. At the December forum Ben basically admitted that the transition had been rushed through during the summer without really beginning soon enough meaning, whilst we were in the market for a higher calibre of player than the previous year, once again we were too late to sign several of our preferred transfer targets. Ben also stated that dealing with professional players (and presumably their agents) regarding contract negotiations is more challenging than before.

I think this has nailed it. I do wonder how many agents are making a good living off the people chatting away about career moves and the rugby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EDC
The Club pays no fees to agents so if they're getting money it's off the players not the club
I fully support the club's stance, but whilst that might not cost the club money perhaps one or two agents have advised players to join other clubs instead?

Many of us support the club because it's not like league football, but as the club grows and progresses all sorts of peripheral aspects become closer to league football.
 
I'll keep it simple.
1 Have a ground to play in.
2 Make the ground a safe playing/spectator environment
3 Have a management team (as long as 1 and 2 are in place not fussed who they are as it means we have a club to support).
This - and very much in that order.
1) The next few months will be crucial for this.
2) this has largely been secured but there are still certain critical aspects that are being worked on very hard at present.
3) Probably not something for me to comment on directly but my primary concern would be that a change would not help with regard to various elements of 1) as we move forward.
 
Last edited:

Gavin Rose is weighing up more changes to his Dulwich Hamlet squad.

The National League South club have until the middle of March before the deadline passes for deals to be done.

Hamlet are in danger of the drop and lost 3-2 at second-placed Bath City on Saturday.

“We are contemplating what we’re doing with loans out and also existing loans in,” said Rose. “We are being offered a few as well that we can bring in.

“We’re even looking at the playing staff who have been here all season and maybe haven’t hit the heights that us – and even they – had hoped for.

“It may be that they move on and make way for some new blood.

“We’re having a little think about that and will make decisions come either the end or early next week.”

Dulwich are 16th in the table and two points ahead of Tonbridge Angels, who are in the final drop spot but have three fixtures in hand.

“We’ve got 10 games to go which is 30 points to play for,” said Rose. “We don’t want to be overly pessimistic.

“In the last two games we had a disappointing result at Welling, we just didn’t turn up, but we gave a good account of ourselves on Saturday against a very good team and lost by the odd goal.

“That tells you we ain’t really that bad and that we’re not in that bad a state. The biggest thing for us is to get that consistency.”

Tom Smith claimed a hat-trick for Bath with Shamir Mullings and Danny Mills twice levelling at Twerton Park.

“The way we conceded the goals was disappointing,” said Rose. “We were asserting quite a bit of pressure on Bath and I felt we were the stronger team at the time we conceded the first goal, it’s one we’d normally defend a lot better.

“The second goal came with us not really doing our jobs from a throw in just over the halfway line and culminated in them breaking and scoring. Visually it looked a good goal but we know we should have defended it better from start to finish.

“For their last goal we had the opportunity to stop the game – maybe give a foul away around the halfway line and shut the shot down on the edge of the box. We gave the guy a free hit and he finished it very well.

“All three were soft goals in terms of us being able to effect them.

“If they had to really earn their goals you would say fair enough, but I don’t think they were well earned.”
 
This - and very much in that order.
1) The next few months will be crucial for this.
2) this has largely been secured but there are still certain critical aspects that are being worked on very hard at present.
3) Probably not something for me to comment on directly but my primary concern would be that a change would not help with regard to various elements of 1) as we move forward.

I cannot see how changing a manager would or should affect a planning application.

The way people, including some in the council, go on you'd think our management made sacrifices when we were exiled.

The truth is that no employee was released or didn't receive their full salary and bonuses as per their contract. There was no financial sacrifice just a few days delay to the odd payment
 
From what I'm reading and can see this club has great potential for the community and beyond
Why we don't have girls teams and junior teams is beyond me but very achievable but it has to be under one banner dhfc I luv what gavin has done but there's a bigger picture to this without us becoming a glen tamplin scenario
 
Back
Top Bottom