Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The cost of activism

Roadkill said:
Nope. An analogy.

Do you know what that means?

I am fully aware of what an analogy is. This has nothing whatever to do with modern protesters in general have not got the guts to face prison or death for their cause.
 
tobyjug said:
Can't stand the truth and have to resort to insults, fairly typical of the modern protestor.

What is a 'modern protester'?

What makes me one?

What makes me a protester?

What makes a protester in the first place?

Why is a modern protester so different from any other protester?

What's wrong with being a protester anyway?

Have you the brainpower to address these questions?

Am I bashing my metaphorical head against an equally metaphorical brick wall for no reason? probably.
 
Roadkill said:
[

What's wrong with being a protester anyway?
.


Nothing if you have the guts to face prison and death without bleating on about measures a democratically elected government takes to prevent your protesting.
 
tobyjug said:
Nothing if you have the guts to face prison and death without bleating on about measures a democratically elected government takes to prevent your protesting.

That doesn't even make grammatical sense, so I'll await with interest the answers to the rest of my questions. :)
 
tobyjug said:
If you believe in a cause the consequences are irrelevant.

Are they?

With every cause? No matter what it might be?

Are you prepared to die because you believe in ridding Cornwall of drug dealers? Would it then be okay if one of said dealers came along and kicked your back door in...?

Had I access to some webspace, I'd make up a 'tobyjug philosophy' pic to complement 'another tobyjug fact.'

But why bother?

Tell me, if everyone who believed in a cause was willing to die for it, where would we be? Would that give everyone who didn't believe in it licence to go round killing everyone else? Maybe Darwin should have been slaughtered by a baying mob at his front gates, chanting 'evolutionists fuck off!?'

How about all the activists, lawyers and journalists who've cleared people of wrongful convictions (eg the Guildford Four)? Should they all have died for their cause?

Christ tobes, even by your standards this is poor stuff. You're losing your edge old boy!
 
tobyjug said:
That covers all your other questions.

See above.

(and no it doesn't anyway)

But then, I'm off to the pub.

Actually, the boozer I'm going to sevres no real ale, and yet I'm a member of CAMRA. That's a cause, isn't it? Should I be prepared to die in pursuit of a realy good pint of hand-pulled ale? :eek:
 
Roadkill said:
Are you prepared to die because you believe in ridding Cornwall of drug dealers?

Absolutely, I have faced down a drugs delivery because I just will not put up with it around me. Neither the delivery man or the dealer were prepared to have ago in the middle of a crowd of people.
There have been several attempts to shut me up, including a very serious attempt to fit me up with an arson charge, the theft of a large quantity of cigarettes and also accuse me of being a paedophile. (The latter caused them so much shit and hassle they leave me well alone now)
 
Tobyjug,

Having lived in a military dictatorship, and currently living in Latin America I should point out that where dissent is outlawed the dissenters tend to arm themselves.

Would you rather have whining protesters or ruthless guerillas?
 
chilango said:
Tobyjug,

Having lived in a military dictatorship, and currently living in Latin America I should point out that where dissent is outlawed the dissenters tend to arm themselves.

Would you rather have whining protesters or ruthless guerillas?

You answer my point very adequately the dissenters in the circumstances you describe have something to protest about and are prepared to be imprisoned and die for it.
 
tobyjug said:
You answer my point very adequately the dissenters in the circumstances you describe have something to protest about and are prepared to be imprisoned and die for it.

Toby, I very very rarely tell you are singing out of your ringpiece but I'm afraid you hitting the Top C note out of it tonight. :mad:
 
tobyjug said:
More insults and no argument.

Right I'll give you the fucking arguement. It used to be that unless you were a serving member of HM Armed Forces you could get out there and make your point in front of the legislature at what ever time people so chose and as long as there wasn't a breach of the peace a la Gordon Riots etc we were allowed to do so.

Now we have the situation where we can be jailed as 'terrorists', our property sequestered using laws designed for dealing with top level drug smugglers, given ASBOs that were designed for arsehole thugs and called harrasers for speaking out under laws designed to protect women from wanky ex partners. And all this just for gathering in front of the legislature that WE elect and who are our representatives allegedly.

What will it take YOU to say enough is enough.

I like you Toby and I find a mixture of common sense and amusement in what you say in the nicest possible way but on this subject you are totally wrong.

Its been over 250-300 years since people were criticised for 'hanging around with Quakers' and this is what is happening to me because of the Quakers pacifism message (that I don't agree with totally I might add).
 
KeyboardJockey said:
What will it take YOU to say enough is enough.
.

My riposte to that is despite all the repressive legislation people here keep wittering on about who as yet has been jailed for peaceful protest?
(and I mean peaceful protest).
 
tobyjug said:
My riposte to that is despite all the repressive legislation people here keep wittering on about who as yet has been jailed for peaceful protest?
(and I mean peaceful protest).

One or two people reading out the names of the dead in Iraq - you don't get much more peaceful than that.
 
KeyboardJockey said:
The next lot just may well be.

My point is they haven't been. Remember the destruction of aircraft that got thrown out of court.
This government can make as much repressibe legislation as it likes it does not mean the judiciary will back them up.
 
tobyjug said:
They have not been jailed.

I'm not going to name names on a bulletin board, but a considerable number of Trident Ploughshares members have spent time in jail, either on remand or for non violent offences. Obstruction of the highway, criminal damage, aggravated trespass, non payment of fines, breach of bail conditions, etc.

So people HAVE in fact been jailed for peaceful protest, and the signs are that many more will be in the future.

Here are the statistics: TP Pledgers have collectively had 2240 arrests made, 520 trials and 2197 days in prison (excluding time spent in police cells). And ALL (without exception) for explicitly NON-violent offences.
 
Pilgrim said:
So people HAVE in fact been jailed for peaceful protest, and the signs are that many more will be in the future,


I am afraid you definition of peaceful protest differs somewhat from mine. Given the sort of direct action Trident Plougshares have been involved in they are lucky in some instances the security on some establishments did not obey standing orders and shoot them.
 
tobyjug said:
I am afraid you definition of peaceful protest differs somewhat from mine. Given the sort of direct action Trident Plougshares have been involved in they are lucky in some instances the security on some establishments did not obey standing orders and shoot them.

My definition of peaceful protest is non violence towards people and animals.

Destruction of carefully targetted property, provided it is directly related to Trident, is permissible.
 
tobyjug said:
I am afraid you definition of peaceful protest differs somewhat from mine. Given the sort of direct action Trident Plougshares have been involved in they are lucky in some instances the security on some establishments did not obey standing orders and shoot them.

Why do you have this strange fantasy about agents of the statekilling people for speaking out?
 
KeyboardJockey said:
Are we seeing the times arriving when it is too costly to protest...

Has anyone else been faced with such a dilemma?
I am sure they have

43693-Soweto-1976-0.jpg
 
posted by tobyjug on another thread:

Well no they haven't [banned xmas] but it was very obvious from the program that despite the hyperbole in the gutter press if joe public had not protested VERY vigorously in some cases there would not been have been a backdown from some very seriously idiotic and over the top political correctness.


Am I alone in spotting an inconsistency here? :D
 
Could anyone post some links to some info on people being prosecuted for reading out lists.

Sounds completely outrageous.

:(

Woof
 
Back
Top Bottom